Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Is there a role for publication consultants and how should their contribution be recognized?

Kendall, G.; Yee, A.; McCollum, B.

Is there a role for publication consultants and how should their contribution be recognized? Thumbnail


Authors

G. Kendall

A. Yee

B. McCollum



Abstract

When a scientific paper, dissertation or thesis is published the author(s) have a duty to report who has contributed to the work. This recognition can take several forms such as authorship, relevant acknowledgments and by citing previous work. There is a growing industry where publication consultants will work with authors, research groups or even institutions to help get their work published, or help submit their dissertation/thesis. This help can range from proof reading, data collection, analysis (including statistics), helping with the literature review and identifying suitable journals/conferences. In this opinion article we question whether these external services are required, given that institutions should provide this support and that experienced researchers should be qualified to carry out these activities. If these services are used, we argue that their use should at least be made transparent either by the consultant being an author on the paper, or by being acknowledged on the paper, dissertation or thesis. We also argue that publication consultants should provide an annual return that details the papers, dissertations and thesis that they have consulted on.

Citation

Kendall, G., Yee, A., & McCollum, B. (2016). Is there a role for publication consultants and how should their contribution be recognized?. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1553-1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9710-9

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 18, 2015
Online Publication Date Oct 19, 2015
Publication Date Oct 30, 2016
Deposit Date Feb 5, 2018
Publicly Available Date Feb 5, 2018
Journal Science and Engineering Ethics
Print ISSN 1353-3452
Electronic ISSN 1353-3452
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 22
Issue 5
Pages 1553-1560
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9710-9
Keywords Ethics ; Agency ; Consultant ; Research misconduct ; Transparency
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/820983
Publisher URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-015-9710-9
Additional Information This is a pre-print of an article published in Science and Engineering Ethics. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9710-9

Files





Downloadable Citations