Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Motor development interventions for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hughes, Anita J.; Redsell, Sarah A.; Glazebrook, Cris

Motor development interventions for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis Thumbnail


Authors

Anita J. Hughes

Sarah A. Redsell

Cris Glazebrook



Abstract

CONTEXTS: Preterm infants are at an increased risk of neurodevelopmental delay. Some studies report positive intervention effects on motor outcomes, but it is currently unclear which motor activities are most effective in the short and longer term.


OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify interventions that improve the motor development of preterm infants.


DATA SOURCES: An a priori protocol was agreed upon. Seventeen electronic databases from 1980 to April 2015 and gray literature sources were searched.


STUDY SELECTION: Three reviewers screened the articles.

DATA EXTRACTION: The outcome of interest was motor skills assessment scores. All data collection and risk of bias assessments were agreed upon by the 3 reviewers.

RESULTS: Forty-two publications, which reported results from 36 trials (25 randomized controlled trials and 11 nonrandomized studies) with a total of 3484 infants, met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted by using standardized mean differences on 21 studies, with positive effects found at 3 months (mean 1.37; confidence interval 0.48–2.27), 6 months (0.34; 0.11–0.57), 12 months (0.73; 0.20–1.26), and 24 months (0.28; 0.07–0.49). At 3 months, there was a large and significant effect size for motor-specific interventions (2.00; 0.28–3.72) but not generic interventions (0.33; –0.03 to –0.69). Studies were not excluded on the basis of quality; therefore, heterogeneity was significant and the random-effects model was used.

LIMITATIONS: Incomplete or inconsistent reporting of outcome measures limited the data available for meta-analysis beyond 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS: A positive intervention effect on motor skills appears to be present up to 24 months’ corrected age. There is some evidence at 3 months that interventions with specific motor components are most effective.

Citation

Hughes, A. J., Redsell, S. A., & Glazebrook, C. (2016). Motor development interventions for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 138(4), Article e20160147. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0147

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 25, 2016
Online Publication Date Sep 16, 2016
Publication Date Oct 31, 2016
Deposit Date Sep 19, 2016
Publicly Available Date Sep 19, 2016
Journal Pediatrics
Print ISSN 0031-4005
Electronic ISSN 1098-4275
Publisher American Academy of Pediatrics
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 138
Issue 4
Article Number e20160147
DOI https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0147
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/820429
Publisher URL http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2016/09/14/peds.2016-0147

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations