Mark Billings
Discretion in accounting for pensions under IAS 19: using the ‘magic telescope’?
Billings, Mark; O'Brien, Christopher; Woods, Margaret; Vencappa, Dev
Authors
Christopher O'Brien
Margaret Woods
Dev Vencappa
Abstract
We use a panel data set of UK-listed companies over the period 2005 to 2009 to analyse the actuarial assumptions used to value pension plan liabilities under IAS 19. The valuation process requires companies to make assumptions about financial and demographic variables, notably discount rate, price inflation, salary inflation, and mortality/life expectancy of plan members/beneficiaries. We use regression analysis to analyse the relationships between these key assumptions (except mortality, where disclosures are limited) and company-specific factors such as the pension plan funding position and duration of pension liabilities. We find evidence of selective ‘management’ of the three assumptions investigated, although the nature of this appears to differ from the findings of US authors. We conclude that IAS 19 does not prevent the use of managerial discretion, particularly by companies whose pension plan funding positions are weak, thereby reducing the representational faithfulness of the reported pension figures. We also highlight that the degree of discretion used reflects the extent to which IAS 19 defines how the assumptions are to be determined. We therefore suggest that companies should be encouraged to justify more explicitly their choice of assumptions.
Citation
Billings, M., O'Brien, C., Woods, M., & Vencappa, D. (in press). Discretion in accounting for pensions under IAS 19: using the ‘magic telescope’?. Accounting and Business Research, https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1205967
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 22, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 11, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Nov 3, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 3, 2016 |
Journal | Accounting and Business Research |
Print ISSN | 0001-4788 |
Electronic ISSN | 2159-4260 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1205967 |
Keywords | Actuarial assumptions; IAS 19; Liability valuation; Managerial discretion |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/801370 |
Publisher URL | http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00014788.2016.1205967 |
Additional Information | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Accounting and Business Research on 11 July 2016 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00014788.2016.1205967 |
Contract Date | Nov 3, 2016 |
Files
ABR main document June 2016 submission.pdf
(638 Kb)
PDF
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search