Dr ANDREW TRENTIN andrew.trentin@nottingham.ac.uk
Senior Application Engineers in n Industrialisation of Electrical Machines and Drives
Experimental efficiency comparison between a direct matrix converter and an indirect matrix converter using both Si IGBTs and SiC MOSFETs
Trentin, Andrew; Liliana de Lillio, Liliana; Empringham, Lee; Zanchetta, Pericle; Wheeler, Patrick; Clare, Jon C.
Authors
Dr LILIANA DE LILLO Liliana.De_lillo@nottingham.ac.uk
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Professor LEE EMPRINGHAM LEE.EMPRINGHAM@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF POWER CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES
Pericle Zanchetta
Professor PATRICK WHEELER pat.wheeler@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF POWER ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS
Jon C. Clare
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental efficiency comparison study between two different direct AC-AC converter topologies: a direct matrix converter (DMC) and an indirect matrix converter (IMC). The evaluation is performed under variable load conditions using both discrete Silicon (Si) IGBTs and Silicon Carbide (SiC) MOSFETs working at power levels up to 9 kW. Each loss measurement is carried out using two power analyzers: one placed at the input and one at the output of the converter under study. To facilitate this measurement an output filter was necessary in addition to the normal input filter. Both converters are modulated the same traditional symmetrical space vector approach and feature an identical input/output filter design.
Citation
Trentin, A., Liliana de Lillio, L., Empringham, L., Zanchetta, P., Wheeler, P., & Clare, J. C. (2016). Experimental efficiency comparison between a direct matrix converter and an indirect matrix converter using both Si IGBTs and SiC MOSFETs. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 52(5), 4135-4145. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2016.2573752
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Conference Name | ECCE 2015 |
Acceptance Date | May 9, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | May 27, 2016 |
Publication Date | Oct 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jun 13, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 13, 2016 |
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications |
Print ISSN | 0093-9994 |
Electronic ISSN | 1939-9367 |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 52 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 4135-4145 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2016.2573752 |
Keywords | Insulated gate bipolar transistors, MOSFET, Matrix converters, Modulation, Silicon, Silicon carbide, Switches |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/788429 |
Publisher URL | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7480421 |
Related Public URLs | http://www.ieee-ecce.org/2015/ |
Additional Information | (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works. |
Contract Date | Jun 13, 2016 |
Files
Experimental Comparison between Direct Matrix Converter and Indirect Matrix Converter Based On Efficiency using Si IGBT and SiC MOSFETs.pdf
(1.3 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
On Optimized Modulation Strategies for Electric Vehicle Integrated On-board Chargers
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search