Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects
D’Adda, Giovanna; Drouvelis, Michalis; Nosenzo, Daniele
We investigate norms of corruption using the norm-elicitation procedure introduced by Krupka and Weber (2013). We use a within-subject design whereby the norms are elicited from the same subjects who are observed making choices in a bribery game. We test whether the order in which the norm-elicitation task and the bribery game are conducted affects elicited norms and behavior. We find little evidence of order effects in our experiment. We discuss how these results compare with those reported in the existing literature.
D’Adda, G., Drouvelis, M., & Nosenzo, D. (2016). Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.02.003
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Feb 26, 2016|
|Online Publication Date||Mar 7, 2016|
|Publication Date||Jun 1, 2016|
|Deposit Date||Apr 6, 2016|
|Publicly Available Date||Apr 6, 2016|
|Journal||Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Social norms; Norm elicitation; Order effects; Within-subject design; Bribery game|
|Copyright Statement||Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0|
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
You might also like
Promoting voter registration: the effects of low-cost interventions on behaviour and norms
On the social inappropriateness of discrimination
Bonus versus penalty: how robust are the effects of contract framing?
The importance of peers for compliance with norms of fair sharing
Employee incentives: bonuses or penalties?