Valentina Escott-Price
Common polygenic variation can predict risk of Alzheimer’s disease
Escott-Price, Valentina; Sims, Rebecca; Bannister, Christian; Harold, Denise; Vronskaya, Maria; Majounie, Elisa; Badarinarayan, Nandini; Morgan, Kevin; Passmore, Peter; Holmes, Clive; Powell, John; Lovestone, Simon; Brayne, Carol; Gill, Michael; Mead, Simon; Goate, Alison; Cruchaga, Carlos; Lambert, Jean-Charles; van Duijn, Cornelia; Maier, Wolfgang; Ramirez, Alfredo; Holmans, Peter; Jones, Lesley; Hardy, John; Seshadri, Sudha; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Amouyel, Philippe; Williams, Julie
Authors
Rebecca Sims
Christian Bannister
Denise Harold
Maria Vronskaya
Elisa Majounie
Nandini Badarinarayan
Kevin Morgan
Peter Passmore
Clive Holmes
John Powell
Simon Lovestone
Carol Brayne
Michael Gill
Simon Mead
Alison Goate
Carlos Cruchaga
Jean-Charles Lambert
Cornelia van Duijn
Wolfgang Maier
Alfredo Ramirez
Peter Holmans
Lesley Jones
John Hardy
Sudha Seshadri
Gerard D. Schellenberg
Philippe Amouyel
Julie Williams
Abstract
Background: The identification of subjects at high risk for Alzheimer’s disease is important for prognosis and early intervention. We investigated the polygenic architecture of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and the accuracy of AD prediction models, including and excluding the polygenic component in the model.
Methods: This study used genotype data from the powerful dataset comprising 17,008 cases and 37,154 controls obtained from the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project (IGAP). Polygenic score analysis tested whether the alleles identified to associate with disease in one sample set were significantly enriched in the cases relative to the controls in an independent sample. The disease prediction accuracy was investigated by means of sensitivity, specificity, Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) and positive predictive value (PPV).
Results: We observed significant evidence for a polygenic component enriched in Alzheimer’s disease (p=4.9x10-26). This enrichment remained significant after APOE and other genome-wide associated regions were excluded (p=3.4x10 19). The best prediction accuracy AUC=78% was achieved by a logistic regression model with APOE, the polygenic score as predictors and age. When looking at the genetic component only, the PPV was 81%, increasing to 82% when age was added as a predictor. Setting the total normalised polygenic score of greater than 0.91, the positive predictive value has reached 90%.
Conclusion: Polygenic score has strong predictive utility of Alzheimer’s disease risk and is a valuable research tool in experimental designs, e.g. for selecting Alzheimer’s disease patients into clinical trials.
Citation
Escott-Price, V., Sims, R., Bannister, C., Harold, D., Vronskaya, M., Majounie, E., Badarinarayan, N., Morgan, K., Passmore, P., Holmes, C., Powell, J., Lovestone, S., Brayne, C., Gill, M., Mead, S., Goate, A., Cruchaga, C., Lambert, J.-C., van Duijn, C., Maier, W., …Williams, J. (2015). Common polygenic variation can predict risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv268
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Oct 21, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Mar 10, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 10, 2016 |
Journal | Brain |
Print ISSN | 0006-8950 |
Electronic ISSN | 1460-2156 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv268 |
Keywords | Alzheimer’s disease, polygenic score, predictive model |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/763340 |
Publisher URL | http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/138/12/3673 |
Files
PolyscoreAD_2015.pdf
(461 Kb)
PDF