J. Arin
A bargaining procedure leading to the serial rule in games with veto players
Arin, J.; Feltkamp, V.; Montero, Maria
Abstract
This paper studies an allocation procedure for coalitional games with veto players. The procedure is similar to the one presented by Arin and Feltkamp (J Math Econ 43:855-870, 2007), which is based on Dagan et al. (Games Econ Behav 18:55-72, 1997). A distinguished player makes a proposal that the remaining players must accept or reject, and conflict is solved bilaterally between the rejector and the proposer. We allow the proposer to make sequential proposals over several periods. If responders are myopic maximizers (i.e. consider each period in isolation), the only equilibrium outcome is the serial rule of Arin and Feltkamp (Eur J Oper Res 216:208-213, 2012) regardless of the order of moves. If all players are fully rational, the serial rule still arises as the unique subgame perfect equilibrium outcome if the order of moves is such that stronger players respond to the proposal after weaker ones.
Citation
Arin, J., Feltkamp, V., & Montero, M. (2015). A bargaining procedure leading to the serial rule in games with veto players. Annals of Operations Research, 229(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1841-5
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Mar 29, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Jul 21, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 22, 2015 |
Journal | Annals of Operations Research |
Print ISSN | 0254-5330 |
Electronic ISSN | 1572-9338 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 229 |
Issue | 1 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1841-5 |
Keywords | Game theory, Veto players, Bargaining, Serial rule |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/746485 |
Publisher URL | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10479-015-1841-5 |
Additional Information | The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1841-5 |
Contract Date | Jul 21, 2015 |
Files
PostprintRepository.pdf
(302 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Postulates and paradoxes of voting power in a noncooperative setting
(2014)
Book Chapter
A model of protocoalition bargaining with breakdown probability
(2015)
Journal Article
Majoritarian Blotto contests with asymmetric battlefields: an experiment on apex games
(2015)
Journal Article
Proportional payoffs in legislative bargaining with weighted voting: a characterization
(2017)
Journal Article
Legislative bargaining with heterogeneous disagreement values: theory and experiments
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search