Professor Tim England Timothy.England@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF STROKE MEDICINE
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in experimental stroke and its effects on infarct size and functional outcome: a systematic review
England, Timothy J.; Gibson, Claire L.; Bath, Philip M.W.
Authors
Claire L. Gibson
Professor PHILIP BATH philip.bath@nottingham.ac.uk
STROKE ASSOCIATION PROFESSOR OF STROKE MEDICINE
Abstract
Background
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) shows promise as a treatment for stroke. This systematic review assesses G-CSF in experimental ischaemic stroke.
Methods
Relevant studies were identified with searches of Medline, Embase and PubMed. Data were extracted on stroke lesion size, neurological outcome and quality, and analysed using Cochrane Review Manager using random effects models; results are expressed as standardised mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR).
Results
Data were included from 19 publications incorporating 666 animals. G-CSF reduced lesion size significantly in transient (SMD -1.63, p<0.00001) but not permanent (SMD -1.56, p=0.11) focal models of ischaemia. Lesion size was reduced at all doses and with treatment commenced within 4 hours of transient ischaemia. Neurological deficit (SMD -1.37, p=0.0004) and limb placement (SMD -1.88, p=0.003) improved with G-CSF; however, locomotor activity (>4 weeks post ischaemia) was not (SMD 0.76, p=0.35). Death (OR 0.27, p<0.0001) was reduced with G-CSF. Median study quality was 4 (range 0-7/8); Egger’s test suggested significant publication bias (p=0.001).
Conclusions
G-CSF significantly reduced lesion size in transient but not permanent models of ischaemic stroke. Motor impairment and death were also reduced. Further studies assessing dose-response, administration time, length of ischaemia and long-term functional recovery are needed.
Citation
England, T. J., Gibson, C. L., & Bath, P. M. (2009). Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in experimental stroke and its effects on infarct size and functional outcome: a systematic review. Brain Research, 62(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.09.002
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 4, 2009 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 12, 2009 |
Publication Date | Dec 11, 2009 |
Deposit Date | Sep 22, 2009 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 22, 2009 |
Journal | Brain Research |
Print ISSN | 0006-8993 |
Electronic ISSN | 1872-6240 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 62 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 71-82 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.09.002 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/705627 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165017309000848?via%3Dihub |
Contract Date | Sep 22, 2009 |
Files
GCSF_MA_Final_version_BRES_Aug_2009.pdf
(429 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Secondary Stroke Prevention: Time for a Clinical Trial?
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search