Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cost-effectiveness of emergency preparedness measures in response to infectious respiratory disease outbreaks: a systematic review and econometric analysis

Vardavas, Constantine; Nikitara, Katerina; Zisis, Konstantinos; Athanasakis, Konstantinos; Phalkey, Revati; Leonardi-Bee, Jo; Johnson, Helen; Tsolova, Svetla; Ciotti, Massimo; Suk, Jonathan E

Cost-effectiveness of emergency preparedness measures in response to infectious respiratory disease outbreaks: a systematic review and econometric analysis Thumbnail


Authors

Constantine Vardavas

Katerina Nikitara

Konstantinos Zisis

Konstantinos Athanasakis

Revati Phalkey

JO LEONARDI-BEE jo.leonardi-bee@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Evidence Synthesis

Helen Johnson

Svetla Tsolova

Massimo Ciotti

Jonathan E Suk



Abstract

Objectives Respiratory infectious disease outbreaks pose a threat for loss of life, economic instability and social disruption. We conducted a systematic review of published econometric analyses to assess the direct and indirect costs of infectious respiratory disease outbreaks that occurred between 2003 and 2019.

Setting Respiratory infectious disease outbreaks or public health preparedness measures or interventions responding to respiratory outbreaks in OECD countries (excluding South Korea and Japan) so as to assess studies relevant to the European context. The cost-effectiveness of interventions was assessed through a dominance ranking matrix approach. All cost data were adjusted to the 2017 Euro, with interventions compared with the null. We included data from 17 econometric studies.

Primary and secondary outcome measures Direct and indirect costs for disease and preparedness and/or response or cost-benefit and cost-utility were measured.

Results Overall, the economic burden of infectious respiratory disease outbreaks was found to be significant to healthcare systems and society. Indirect costs were greater than direct costs mainly due to losses of productivity. With regard to non-pharmaceutical strategies, prehospitalisation screening and the use of protective masks were identified as both an effective strategy and cost-saving. Community contact reduction was effective but had ambiguous results for cost saving. School closure was an effective measure, but not cost-saving in the long term. Targeted antiviral prophylaxis was the most cost-saving and effective pharmaceutical intervention.

Conclusions Our cost analysis results provide evidence to policymakers on the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies which may be applied to mitigate or respond to infectious respiratory disease outbreaks.

Citation

Vardavas, C., Nikitara, K., Zisis, K., Athanasakis, K., Phalkey, R., Leonardi-Bee, J., …Suk, J. E. (2021). Cost-effectiveness of emergency preparedness measures in response to infectious respiratory disease outbreaks: a systematic review and econometric analysis. BMJ Open, 11(4), Article e045113. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045113

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 23, 2021
Online Publication Date Apr 29, 2021
Publication Date 2021-04
Deposit Date Jun 15, 2021
Publicly Available Date Jun 15, 2021
Journal BMJ Open
Electronic ISSN 2044-6055
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 11
Issue 4
Article Number e045113
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045113
Keywords General Medicine
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5686002
Publisher URL https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/4/e045113

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations