H. Doit
A systematic review of the quality of life assessment tools for cats in the published literature
Doit, H.; Dean, R. S.; Duz, M.; Brennan, M. L.
Authors
R. S. Dean
MARCO DUZ MARCO.DUZ@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Clinical Associate Professor
MARNIE BRENNAN MARNIE.BRENNAN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) is an important parameter to assess in cats, as it can be pivotal to important decision-making. Research reports that owners of cats with heart disease would trade longevity for QoL, and treatment associated improvement in QoL is very important for cats with chronic kidney disease. This systematic review aimed to explore the published literature to identify the number and range of QoL assessment tools available to researchers and veterinary professionals, by discovering tools which have already been used in published studies. Medline and CAB Abstracts were searched in March 2018, using terms relevant to cats and QoL or well-being. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and information on uniqueness, validation and a short description of each tool extracted. A total of 1138 manuscripts were identified, of which 96 met all criteria. Forty of 96 manuscripts contained an assessment of QoL, using one of 32 unique tools identified. Sixteen of the tools identified were structured, making detailed patient assessments. Only eight of the structured tools were validated, and of these, three could be applied to healthy cats; the remainder being specific to a disease or being hospitalised. Some validated tools appeared in more than one manuscript. Overall, 12 manuscripts used a validated tool. In the 16 unstructured tools, five tools assessed QoL by assigning a single word (e.g. ‘poor’). Eight tools assessed QoL on a single Likert scale (e.g. a number between 1 and 5). This work identifies the tools that are currently available for the assessment of QoL by researchers and veterinary professionals. Additionally, it demonstrates that many are not validated or lack detailed animal assessment, highlighting that further work in this important area is needed.
Citation
Doit, H., Dean, R. S., Duz, M., & Brennan, M. L. (2021). A systematic review of the quality of life assessment tools for cats in the published literature. Veterinary Journal, 272, Article 105658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105658
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 17, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 23, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2021-06 |
Deposit Date | May 20, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 24, 2022 |
Journal | Veterinary Journal |
Print ISSN | 1090-0233 |
Electronic ISSN | 1532-2971 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 272 |
Article Number | 105658 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105658 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5563340 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090023321000538?via%3Dihub |
Files
Figure 2 v4
(139 Kb)
PDF
New Figure 1 v2
(120 Kb)
Other
QoL cats SR 12_02_2020_edJM_HD_edits_12_03_21_no_tracking
(314 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Evaluation of veterinarians’ views on the aetiology and treatment of retained fetal membranes in the mare
(2017)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search