Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

How Quality Improvement Collaboratives Work to Improve Healthcare in Care Homes: A Realist Evaluation

Devi, Reena; Chadborn, Neil H; Meyer, Julienne; Banerjee, Jay; Goodman, Claire; Dening, Tom; Rf Gladman, John; Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn; Long, Annabelle; Usman, Adeela; Housley, Gemma; Lewis, Sarah; Glover, Matthew; Gage, Heather; Logan, Philippa A; Martin, Finbarr C; Gordon, Adam L

How Quality Improvement Collaboratives Work to Improve Healthcare in Care Homes: A Realist Evaluation Thumbnail


Authors

Reena Devi

Julienne Meyer

Jay Banerjee

Claire Goodman

Profile Image

TOM DENING TOM.DENING@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Clinical Professor in Dementia Research

JOHN GLADMAN john.gladman@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Medicine of Older People

Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith

Adeela Usman

Gemma Housley

Matthew Glover

Heather Gage

PIP LOGAN pip.logan@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Rehabilitation Research

Finbarr C Martin

ADAM GORDON Adam.Gordon@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of The Care of Older People



Abstract

Background
Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) bring together multidisciplinary teams in a structured process to improve care quality. How QICs can be used to support healthcare improvement in care homes is not fully understood.

Methods
A realist evaluation to develop and test a programme theory of how QICs work to improve healthcare in care homes. A multiple case study design considered implementation across 4 sites and 29 care homes. Observations, interviews and focus groups captured contexts and mechanisms operating within QICs. Data analysis classified emerging themes using context-mechanism-outcome configurations to explain how NHS and care home staff work together to design and implement improvement.

Results
QICs will be able to implement and iterate improvements in care homes where they have a broad and easily understandable remit; recruit staff with established partnership working between the NHS and care homes; use strategies to build relationships and minimise hierarchy; protect and pay for staff time; enable staff to implement improvements aligned with existing work; help members develop plans in manageable chunks through QI coaching; encourage QIC members to recruit multidisciplinary support through existing networks; facilitate meetings in care homes and use shared learning events to build multidisciplinary interventions stepwise. Teams did not use measurement for change, citing difficulties integrating this into pre-existing and QI-related workload.

Conclusions
These findings outline what needs to be in place for health and social care staff to work together to effect change. Further research needs to consider ways to work alongside staff to incorporate measurement for change into QI.

Citation

Devi, R., Chadborn, N. H., Meyer, J., Banerjee, J., Goodman, C., Dening, T., …Gordon, A. L. (2021). How Quality Improvement Collaboratives Work to Improve Healthcare in Care Homes: A Realist Evaluation. Age and Ageing, 50(4), 1371-1381. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab007

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 5, 2021
Online Publication Date Feb 16, 2021
Publication Date 2021-07
Deposit Date Jan 5, 2021
Publicly Available Date Feb 17, 2022
Journal Age and Ageing
Print ISSN 0002-0729
Electronic ISSN 1468-2834
Publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 50
Issue 4
Pages 1371-1381
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab007
Keywords Nursing homes; quality improvement; quality improvement collaboratives; health services research; primary care Key points:
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5201415
Publisher URL https://academic.oup.com/ageing/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ageing/afab007/6137653

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations