Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A systematic review evaluating the implementation of technologies to assess, monitor and treat neurodevelopmental disorders: A map of the current evidence

Valentine, Althea Z.; Brown, Beverley J.; Groom, Madeleine J.; Young, Emma; Hollis, Chris; Hall, Charlotte L.

A systematic review evaluating the implementation of technologies to assess, monitor and treat neurodevelopmental disorders: A map of the current evidence Thumbnail


Authors

Althea Z. Valentine

Emma Young

CHRIS HOLLIS chris.hollis@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Digital Mental Health



Abstract

Technology-based interventions provide an attractive option for improving service provision for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), for example, widening access to interventions, objective assessment, and monitoring; however, it is unclear whether there is sufficient evidence to support their use in clinical settings. This review provides an evidence map describing how technology is implemented in the assessment/diagnosis and monitoring/ treatment of NDD (Prospero CRD42018091156). Using predefined search terms in six databases, 7982 articles were identified, 808 full-texts were screened, resulting in 47 included papers. These studies were appraised and synthesised according to the following outcomes of interest: effectiveness (clinical effectiveness/ service delivery efficiencies), economic impact, and user impact (acceptability/ feasibility). The findings describe how technology is currently being utilised clinically, highlights gaps in knowledge, and discusses future research needs. Technology has been used to facilitate assessment and treatment across multiple NDD, especially Autism Spectrum (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity (ADHD) disorders. Technologies include mobile apps/tablets, robots, gaming, computerised tests, videos, and virtual reality. The outcomes presented largely focus on the clinical effectiveness of the technology, with approximately half the papers demonstrating some degree of effectiveness, however, the methodological quality of many studies is limited. Further research should focus on randomised controlled trial designs with longer follow-up periods, incorporating an economic evaluation, as well as qualitative studies including process evaluations and user impact.

Citation

Valentine, A. Z., Brown, B. J., Groom, M. J., Young, E., Hollis, C., & Hall, C. L. (2020). A systematic review evaluating the implementation of technologies to assess, monitor and treat neurodevelopmental disorders: A map of the current evidence. Clinical Psychology Review, 80, 101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101870

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 24, 2020
Online Publication Date Jun 1, 2020
Publication Date 2020-08
Deposit Date Aug 17, 2020
Publicly Available Date Aug 17, 2020
Journal Clinical Psychology Review
Print ISSN 0272-7358
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 80
Pages 101870
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101870
Keywords Clinical Psychology; Psychiatry and Mental health
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4840282
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735820300581?via%3Dihub
Additional Information This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: A systematic review evaluating the implementation of technologies to assess, monitor and treat neurodevelopmental disorders: A map of the current evidence; Journal Title: Clinical Psychology Review; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101870; Content Type: article; Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.