Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Minimal transmission in an influenza A (H3N2) human challenge-transmission model within a controlled exposure environment

Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S.; Killingley, Ben; Enstone, Joanne; Hewitt, Michael; Pantelic, Jovan; Grantham, Michael L.; Bueno de Mesquita, P. Jacob; Lambkin-Williams, Robert; Gilbert, Anthony; Mann, Alexander; Forni, John; Noakes, Catherine J.; Levine, Min Z.; Berman, LaShondra; Lindstrom, Stephen; Cauchemez, Simon; Bischoff, Werner; Tellier, Raymond; Milton, Donald K.; for the EMIT Consortium

Minimal transmission in an influenza A (H3N2) human challenge-transmission model within a controlled exposure environment Thumbnail


Authors

Jonathan S. Nguyen-Van-Tam

Ben Killingley

Joanne Enstone

Michael Hewitt

Jovan Pantelic

Michael L. Grantham

P. Jacob Bueno de Mesquita

Robert Lambkin-Williams

Anthony Gilbert

Alexander Mann

John Forni

Catherine J. Noakes

Min Z. Levine

LaShondra Berman

Stephen Lindstrom

Simon Cauchemez

Werner Bischoff

Raymond Tellier

Donald K. Milton

for the EMIT Consortium



Contributors

Peter Palese
Editor

Abstract

Uncertainty about the importance of influenza transmission by airborne droplet nuclei generates controversy for infection control. Human challenge-transmission studies have been supported as the most promising approach to fill this knowledge gap. Healthy, seronegative volunteer ‘Donors’ (n = 52) were randomly selected for intranasal challenge with influenza A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2). ‘Recipients’ randomized to Intervention (IR, n = 40) or Control (CR, n = 35) groups were exposed to Donors for four days. IRs wore face shields and hand sanitized frequently to limit large droplet and contact transmission. One transmitted infection was confirmed by serology in a CR, yielding a secondary attack rate of 2.9% among CR, 0% in IR (p = 0.47 for group difference), and 1.3% overall, significantly less than 16% (p [less than] 0.001) expected based on a proof-of-concept study secondary attack rate and considering that there were twice as many Donors and days of exposure. The main difference between these studies was mechanical building ventilation in the follow-on study, suggesting a possible role for aerosols.

Citation

Nguyen-Van-Tam, J. S., Killingley, B., Enstone, J., Hewitt, M., Pantelic, J., Grantham, M. L., …for the EMIT Consortium. (2020). Minimal transmission in an influenza A (H3N2) human challenge-transmission model within a controlled exposure environment. PLoS Pathogens, 16(7), Article e1008704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008704

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 9, 2020
Online Publication Date Jul 13, 2020
Publication Date Jul 13, 2020
Deposit Date Jul 18, 2020
Publicly Available Date Jul 31, 2020
Journal PLOS Pathogens
Print ISSN 1553-7366
Electronic ISSN 1553-7374
Publisher Public Library of Science
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 16
Issue 7
Article Number e1008704
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008704
Keywords Immunology; Genetics; Molecular Biology; Microbiology; Parasitology; Virology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4772628
Publisher URL https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1008704

Files





Downloadable Citations