Peter J Godolphin
Cost-benefit of outcome adjudication in nine randomised stroke trials
Godolphin, Peter J; Bath, Philip M; Algra, Ale; Berge, Eivind; Chalmers, John; Eliasziw, Misha; Hankey, Graeme J; Hosomi, Naohisa; Ranta, Annamarei; Weimar, Christian; Woodhouse, Lisa J; Montgomery, Alan A
Authors
Professor PHILIP BATH philip.bath@nottingham.ac.uk
STROKE ASSOCIATION PROFESSOR OF STROKE MEDICINE
Ale Algra
Eivind Berge
John Chalmers
Misha Eliasziw
Graeme J Hankey
Naohisa Hosomi
Annamarei Ranta
Christian Weimar
Dr LISA WOODHOUSE L.Woodhouse@nottingham.ac.uk
RESEARCH FELLOW
Professor ALAN MONTGOMERY ALAN.MONTGOMERY@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
DIRECTOR NOTTINGHAM CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT
Abstract
Background: Central adjudication of outcomes is common for randomised trials and should control for differential misclassification. However, few studies have estimated the cost of the adjudication process.
Methods: We estimated the cost of adjudicating the primary outcome in nine randomised stroke trials (25,436 participants). The costs included adjudicators’ time, direct payments to adjudicators, and co-ordinating centre costs (e.g. uploading cranial scans and general set-up costs). The number of events corrected after adjudication was our measure of benefit. We calculated cost per corrected event for each trial and in total.
Results: The primary outcome in all nine trials was either stroke or a composite that included stroke. In total, the adjudication process associated with this primary outcome cost in excess of £100,000 for a third of the trials (3/9). Mean cost per event corrected by adjudication was £2295.10 (standard deviation: £1482.42).
Conclusions: Central adjudication is a time-consuming and potentially costly process. These costs need to be considered when designing a trial and should be evaluated alongside the potential benefits adjudication brings to determine whether they outweigh this expense.
Citation
Godolphin, P. J., Bath, P. M., Algra, A., Berge, E., Chalmers, J., Eliasziw, M., Hankey, G. J., Hosomi, N., Ranta, A., Weimar, C., Woodhouse, L. J., & Montgomery, A. A. (2020). Cost-benefit of outcome adjudication in nine randomised stroke trials. Clinical Trials, 17(5), 576-580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774520939231
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 4, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 10, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2020-10 |
Deposit Date | Jun 10, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 10, 2020 |
Journal | Clinical Trials |
Print ISSN | 1740-7745 |
Electronic ISSN | 1740-7753 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 17 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 576-580 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774520939231 |
Keywords | Adjudication, stroke, clinical trial |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4619538 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1740774520939231 |
Files
AOST Cost Manuscript Accepted Version 04May20
(249 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search