Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Spinal or general anaesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture and subsequent risk of mortality and morbidity: a database analysis using propensity score?matching

Morgan, L.; McKeever, T. M.; Nightingale, J.; Deakin, D. E.; Moppett, I. K.

Spinal or general anaesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture and subsequent risk of mortality and morbidity: a database analysis using propensity score?matching Thumbnail


Authors

L. Morgan

TRICIA MCKEEVER tricia.mckeever@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics

J. Nightingale

D. E. Deakin

IAIN MOPPETT iain.moppett@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine



Abstract

Around 76,000 people fracture their hip annually in the UK at a considerable personal, social and financial cost. Despite longstanding debate, the optimal mode of anaesthesia (general or spinal) remains unclear. Our aim was to assess whether there is a significant difference in mortality and morbidity between patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia during hip fracture surgery. A secondary analysis examined whether a difference exists in mortality for patients with pre‐existing cardiovascular disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This was a clinical database analysis of patients treated for hip fracture in Nottingham, UK between 2004 and 2015. Propensity score‐matching was used to generate matched pairs of patients, one of whom underwent each mode of anaesthesia. Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression, with 7164 patients successfully matched. There was no difference in 30‐ or 90‐day mortality in patients who had spinal rather than general anaesthesia (OR [95%CI] 0.97 [0.8–1.15]; p = 0.764 and 0.93 [0.82–1.05]; p = 0.247 respectively). Patients who had a spinal anaesthetic had a lower‐risk of blood transfusion (OR [95%CI] 0.84 [0.75–0.94]; p = 0.003) and urinary tract infection (OR [95%CI] 0.72 [0.61–0.84]; p [less than] 0.001), but were more likely to develop a chest infection (OR [95%CI] 1.23 [1.07–1.42]; p = 0.004), deep vein thrombosis (OR [95%CI] 2.18 [1.07–4.45]; p = 0.032) or pulmonary embolism (OR [95%CI] 2.23 [1.16–4.29]; p = 0.016). The mode of anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery resulted in no significant difference in mortality, but there was a significant difference in several measures of postoperative morbidity.

Citation

Morgan, L., McKeever, T. M., Nightingale, J., Deakin, D. E., & Moppett, I. K. (2020). Spinal or general anaesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture and subsequent risk of mortality and morbidity: a database analysis using propensity score?matching. Anaesthesia, 75(9), 1173-1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15042

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 11, 2020
Online Publication Date Apr 26, 2020
Publication Date 2020-09
Deposit Date Mar 20, 2020
Publicly Available Date Apr 27, 2021
Journal Anaesthesia
Print ISSN 0003-2409
Electronic ISSN 1365-2044
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 75
Issue 9
Pages 1173-1179
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15042
Keywords Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4173616
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/anae.15042

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations