Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Do neuroticism and efficacy beliefs moderate the relationship between climate change worry and mental wellbeing?

Ogunbode, Charles A.; Salmela-Aro, Katariina; Maran, Daniela Acquadro; van den Broek, Karlijn; Doran, Rouven; Lins, Samuel; Torres-Marín, Jorge; Navarro-Carrillo, Ginés; Rocchi, Giulia; Schermer, Julie Aitken

Do neuroticism and efficacy beliefs moderate the relationship between climate change worry and mental wellbeing? Thumbnail


Authors

CHARLES OGUNBODE CHARLES.OGUNBODE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Assistant Professor in Applied Psychology

Katariina Salmela-Aro

Daniela Acquadro Maran

Karlijn van den Broek

Rouven Doran

Samuel Lins

Jorge Torres-Marín

Ginés Navarro-Carrillo

Giulia Rocchi

Julie Aitken Schermer



Contributors

Abstract

Background

Research on the nature and prevalence of phenomena like climate anxiety (or eco-anxiety) is increasing rapidly but there is little understanding of the conditions under which climate change worry becomes more or less likely to significantly impact mental wellbeing. Here, we considered two plausible moderators of the relationship between climate change worry and mental wellbeing: neuroticism and efficacy beliefs.

Methods
Analysis was conducted with survey data gathered in six European countries in autumn 2019. Participants were recruited from universities in the participating countries using opportunity sampling.

Results
We found that climate change worry is negatively related to mental wellbeing at any level of perceived efficacy. In contrast, climate change worry is only significantly related to mental wellbeing at low and average levels of neuroticism. High neuroticism appears to have a masking, rather than amplifying, role in the relationship between climate change worry and mental wellbeing.

Limitations
The cross-sectional design of the study precludes verification of causal relationships among variables. The brief measure of neuroticism employed also did not allow for nuanced analysis of how different facets of neuroticism contribute to the observed interaction with climate change worry. Findings cannot be indiscriminately generalised to less privileged groups facing the worst impacts of the climate crisis.

Conclusion
Our findings lend to a view that harmful impacts of climate change worry on mental wellbeing cannot simply be ascribed to dispositional traits like neuroticism. We advocate for interventions that tackle negative climate-related emotions as unique psychological stressors.

Citation

Ogunbode, C. A., Salmela-Aro, K., Maran, D. A., van den Broek, K., Doran, R., Lins, S., Torres-Marín, J., Navarro-Carrillo, G., Rocchi, G., & Schermer, J. A. (2024). Do neuroticism and efficacy beliefs moderate the relationship between climate change worry and mental wellbeing?. Journal of Affective Disorders, 364, 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.018

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 9, 2024
Online Publication Date Aug 10, 2024
Publication Date Nov 1, 2024
Deposit Date Aug 12, 2024
Publicly Available Date Aug 14, 2024
Journal Journal of Affective Disorders
Print ISSN 0165-0327
Electronic ISSN 1573-2517
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 364
Pages 37-40
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.018
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/38370025
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724012308?via%3Dihub

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations