Paul Clarkson
Cost effectiveness of pilot self-assessment sites in community care services in England
Clarkson, Paul; Brand, Christian; Hughes, Jane; Challis, David; Tucker, Sue; Abendstern, Michele
Authors
Christian Brand
Jane Hughes
Professor DAVID CHALLIS David.Challis@nottingham.ac.uk
RESEARCHER (CO-INVESTIGATOR)
Sue Tucker
Michele Abendstern
Abstract
Objective Self-assessment has been advocated in community care but little is known of its cost effectiveness in practice. We evaluated cost effectiveness of pilot self-assessment approaches. Methods Data were collected from 13 pilot projects in England, selected by central government, between October 2006 and November 2007. These were located within preventative services for people with low-level needs, occupational therapy, or assessment and care management. Cost effectiveness, over usual care, was assessed by incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), in British pounds per unit gain in assessment satisfaction. A public-sector perspective was adopted; the provider costs of the agencies taking part. Results At 2006-07 prices, including start-up and on-going costs, only three pilots demonstrated cost effectiveness. Two pilots in assessment and care management had ICERs of £3810 and £755 per satisfaction gained, well below a benchmark from a trial of usual assessment of £18296 per satisfaction gained. When extrapolating uptake to numbers accessing assessments over 1 year, one occupational therapy pilot, of £123/satisfaction gained, also fell below this benchmark in sensitivity analysis. There was less evidence for preventative services. Conclusions and implications Most pilot projects were not cost effective. However, self assessment is potentially cost effective in assessment and care management and occupational therapy services. Better quality cost data from pilot sites would have permitted more detailed analysis. Measuring downstream effects in terms of users' well being from receipt of self-assessment would also be beneficial. What is known about this topic A consumer case for self assessment in community social care has been advanced and policy in England has advocated the approach. The cost effectiveness of such approaches is not known. What does this paper add This paper suggests that implementing a self-assessment approach in assessment and care management and occupational therapy services is potentially cost effective taking account of a range of assumptions concerning uptake. What are the implications for practitioners For policy makers, these data suggest self assessment could provide enhanced user satisfaction with the assessment process at a relatively modest investment. For agencies implementing the approach, better quality data systems are needed that can track costs and impacts to evaluate the approach further. © AHHA 2013.
Citation
Clarkson, P., Brand, C., Hughes, J., Challis, D., Tucker, S., & Abendstern, M. (2013). Cost effectiveness of pilot self-assessment sites in community care services in England. Australian Health Review, 37(5), 666-674. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13056
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 19, 2013 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 28, 2013 |
Publication Date | 2013 |
Deposit Date | Jul 15, 2020 |
Journal | Australian Health Review |
Print ISSN | 0156-5788 |
Electronic ISSN | 1449-8944 |
Publisher | CSIRO Publishing |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 37 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 666-674 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13056 |
Keywords | assessment, care management, economic analysis, individualised care, occupational therapy, preventative services |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3752273 |
Publisher URL | https://www.publish.csiro.au/ah/AH13056 |
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search