Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparing motivations and barriers to reduce meat and adopt protein alternatives amongst meat-eaters in Australia, China and the UK

Ford, Hannah; Zhang, Yuchen; Gould, Joanne; Danner, Lukas; Bastian, Susan E.P.; Yang, Qian

Comparing motivations and barriers to reduce meat and adopt protein alternatives amongst meat-eaters in Australia, China and the UK Thumbnail


Authors

Hannah Ford

Yuchen Zhang

Lukas Danner

Susan E.P. Bastian



Abstract

Motivations are central in determining consumer food choices and provide insights regarding barriers to change. Given the global need to transition towards more sustainable protein consumption patterns, understanding cross-cultural motivations is important. The present research aimed to address this knowledge gap by reviewing motivations to reduce meat and to adopt meat substitutes, edible insects and cultured meat amongst meat-eating consumers in Australia, China and the UK (n = 1,777). An online survey captured the importance of key motivations via closed-ended statements, with barriers to change collected via open-ended questions for extremely unwilling consumers. Results found food safety and environmental benefits to be the most important motives for meat reduction and protein alternatives adoption. Chinese and UK consumers were more motivated by these factors compared to Australian consumers who had the greatest proportion of consumers unwilling to reduce based on the belief meat consumption is necessary for health reasons. Relative differences in motivational importance were also apparent by protein alternative type. In general, the greatest proportion of unwilling responses amongst Australians (n = 245) related to the use of meat substitutes, whilst for Chinese (n = 160) and UK consumers (n = 97) it related to edible insects. Six key themes were identified amongst extremely unwilling consumers, with the protein alternatives being perceived as; Unhealthy, Unnecessary, Unsustainable, Unsafe, Unnatural and Unappealing. The prominence of themes differed between countries and across protein categories, but the perception that alternatives were unnecessary was a communal theme. Overall, the findings provide interesting insights and recommendations to support country-specific protein transitions.

Citation

Ford, H., Zhang, Y., Gould, J., Danner, L., Bastian, S. E., & Yang, Q. (2024). Comparing motivations and barriers to reduce meat and adopt protein alternatives amongst meat-eaters in Australia, China and the UK. Food Quality and Preference, 118, Article 105208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105208

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 27, 2024
Online Publication Date Apr 29, 2024
Publication Date 2024-09
Deposit Date Apr 30, 2024
Publicly Available Date May 9, 2024
Journal Food Quality and Preference
Print ISSN 0950-3293
Electronic ISSN 0950-3293
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 118
Article Number 105208
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105208
Keywords Motivations, Meat reduction, Protein alternatives, Cross-cultural, Open-ended questions
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/34324694
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001101?via%3Dihub

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations