Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evaluation of an in silico cardiac safety assay: Using ion channel screening data to predict QT interval changes in the rabbit ventricular wedge

Beattie, Kylie A.; Luscombe, Chris; Williams, Geoff; Munoz-Muriedas, Jordi; Gavaghan, David J.; Cui, Yi; Mirams, Gary R.

Evaluation of an in silico cardiac safety assay: Using ion channel screening data to predict QT interval changes in the rabbit ventricular wedge Thumbnail


Authors

Kylie A. Beattie

Chris Luscombe

Geoff Williams

Jordi Munoz-Muriedas

David J. Gavaghan

Yi Cui



Abstract

Introduction
Drugs that prolong the QT interval on the electrocardiogram present a major safety concern for pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies. Despite a range of assays performed to assess compound effects on the QT interval, QT prolongation remains a major cause of attrition during compound development. In silico assays could alleviate such problems. In this study we evaluated an in silico method of predicting the results of a rabbit left-ventricular wedge assay.

Methods
Concentration–effect data were acquired from either: the high-throughput IonWorks/FLIPR; the medium-throughput PatchXpress ion channel assays; or QSAR, a statistical IC50 value prediction model, for hERG, fast sodium, L-type calcium and KCNQ1/minK channels. Drug block of channels was incorporated into a mathematical differential equation model of rabbit ventricular myocyte electrophysiology through modification of the maximal conductance of each channel by a factor dependent on the IC50 value, Hill coefficient and concentration of each compound tested. Simulations were performed and agreement with experimental results, based upon input data from the different assays, was evaluated.

Results
The assay was found to be 78% accurate, 72% sensitive and 81% specific when predicting QT prolongation (> 10%) using PatchXpress assay data (77 compounds). Similar levels of predictivity were demonstrated using IonWorks/FLIPR data (121 compounds) with 78% accuracy, 73% sensitivity and 80% specificity. QT shortening ([less than] − 10%) was predicted with 77% accuracy, 33% sensitivity and 90% specificity using PatchXpress data and 71% accuracy, 42% sensitivity and 81% specificity using IonWorks/FLIPR data. Strong quantitative agreement between simulation and experimental results was also evident.

Discussion
The in silico action potential assay demonstrates good predictive ability, and is suitable for very high-throughput use in early drug development. Adoption of such an assay into cardiovascular safety assessment, integrating ion channel data from routine screens to infer results of animal-based tests, could provide a cost- and time-effective cardiac safety screen.

Citation

Beattie, K. A., Luscombe, C., Williams, G., Munoz-Muriedas, J., Gavaghan, D. J., Cui, Y., & Mirams, G. R. (2013). Evaluation of an in silico cardiac safety assay: Using ion channel screening data to predict QT interval changes in the rabbit ventricular wedge. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 68(1), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2013.04.004

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 17, 2013
Publication Date Jul 1, 2013
Deposit Date Jan 14, 2020
Publicly Available Date Feb 28, 2020
Journal Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods
Print ISSN 1056-8719
Electronic ISSN 1873-488X
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 68
Issue 1
Pages 88-96
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2013.04.004
Keywords Toxicology; Pharmacology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3217526
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105687191300244X?via%3Dihub
Additional Information This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Evaluation of an in silico cardiac safety assay: Using ion channel screening data to predict QT interval changes in the rabbit ventricular wedge; Journal Title: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2013.04.004; Content Type: article; Copyright: Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations