Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Apathy and Its Response to Antipsychotic Review and Nonpharmacological Interventions in People With Dementia Living in Nursing Homes: WHELD, a Factorial Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Rajkumar, Anto P.; Ballard, Clive; Fossey, Jane; Corbett, Anne; Woods, Bob; Orrell, Martin; Prakash, Rohan; Moniz-Cook, Esme; Testad, Ingelin

Apathy and Its Response to Antipsychotic Review and Nonpharmacological Interventions in People With Dementia Living in Nursing Homes: WHELD, a Factorial Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Thumbnail


Authors

Clive Ballard

Jane Fossey

Anne Corbett

Bob Woods

MARTIN ORRELL M.ORRELL@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Director - Institute of Mental Health

Rohan Prakash

Esme Moniz-Cook

Ingelin Testad



Abstract

Objectives
Apathy is common, impactful, and difficult to manage in people with dementia. We evaluated the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions, exercise, and social interaction, in combination with antipsychotic review, to reduce apathy in people with dementia living in nursing homes in a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Methods
Well-being and health for people with dementia (WHELD) program included a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial cluster RCT involving people with dementia living in 16 nursing homes in the United Kingdom. All homes received training in person-centered care, and were randomized to receive antipsychotic review, social interaction, and exercise, either alone or in combinations. Apathy was one of the secondary outcomes of the WHELD trial, and it was measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory–nursing home version at baseline and 9 months (n = 273). We used multilevel mixed effects linear regression models to assess the impact of the interventions on apathy.

Results
Prevalence of apathy was 44.0% (n = 120; 95% confidence interval [CI] 38.1%–49.9%) at baseline. Severity of apathy had significant positive correlations with dementia severity, neuropsychiatric symptoms, depressive symptoms, agitation, and the needs of the people with dementia (P < .001). Antipsychotic review reduced antipsychotic use, but it significantly increased apathy (β = 5.37; SE = 0.91; P < .001). However, antipsychotic review in combination with either social interaction (β = −5.84; SE = 1.15; P < .001) or exercise (β = −7.54; SE = 0.93; P < .001) significantly reduced apathy.

Conclusions
Antipsychotic review can play a significant role in improving apathy in people with dementia living in nursing homes, when combined with psychosocial interventions such as social interaction and exercise. Guidance must be adapted to reflect this subtlety in care.

Citation

Rajkumar, A. P., Ballard, C., Fossey, J., Corbett, A., Woods, B., Orrell, M., …Testad, I. (2016). Apathy and Its Response to Antipsychotic Review and Nonpharmacological Interventions in People With Dementia Living in Nursing Homes: WHELD, a Factorial Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 17(8), 741-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.04.006

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 12, 2016
Online Publication Date May 12, 2016
Publication Date 2016-08
Deposit Date Nov 11, 2019
Publicly Available Date Nov 11, 2019
Journal Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Print ISSN 1525-8610
Electronic ISSN 1538-9375
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 17
Issue 8
Pages 741-747
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.04.006
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3205403
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861016300913?via%3Dihub

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations