Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Panel discussion [of paper: Combined exposure to anti-androgens causes markedly increased frequencies of hypospadias in the rat]

Ivell, R.; Hass, U.; Anand-Ivell, R.; Gray, E.

Authors

R. Ivell

U. Hass

E. Gray



Abstract

This is a panel discussion of: Combined exposure to anti-androgens causes markedly increased frequencies of hypospadias in the rat / S. Christiansen, M. Scholze, M. Axelstad, J. Boberg, A. Kortenkamp, U. Hass.

Summary of main paper:
The incidence of hypospadias is increasing in young boys, but it remains unclear whether human exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals plays a role. Risk assessment is based on estimation of no-observed-adverse-effect levels for single compounds, although humans are exposed to combinations of several anti-androgenic chemicals. In a mixture (MIX) study with three androgen receptor antagonists, vinclozolin, flutamide and procymidone, rats were gavaged during gestation and lactation with several doses of a MIX of the three chemicals or the chemicals alone. External malformations of the male reproductive organs were assessed on PND 47 using a score from 0 to 3 (normal to marked) for hypospadias. Markedly increased frequencies were observed after exposure to a MIX of the three chemicals compared to administration of the three chemicals alone. Anogenital distance at PND 1, nipple retention at PND 13, and dysgenesis score at PND 16 were highly correlated with the occurrence of hypospadias, and MIX effects were seen at doses where each of the individual chemicals caused no observable effects. Therefore, the results indicate that doses of anti-androgens, which appear to induce no hypospadias when judged on their own, may induce a very high frequency of hypospadias when they interact in concert with other anti-androgens.

Journal Article Type Conference Paper
Publication Date Jan 1, 2008
Deposit Date Jun 15, 2021
Journal International Journal of Andrology
Print ISSN 0105-6263
Electronic ISSN 1365-2605
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 31
Issue 2
Pages 247-248
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00866.x
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3176595
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00866.x#:~:text=panel%20discussion