Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Risk-stratified monitoring for sulfasalazine toxicity: prognostic model development and validation

Abhishek, Abhishek; Grainge, Matthew; Card, Tim; Williams, Hywel C; Taal, Maarten W; Aithal, Guruprasad P; Fox, Christopher P; Mallen, Christian D; Stevenson, Matthew D; Nakafero, Georgina; Riley, Richard

Risk-stratified monitoring for sulfasalazine toxicity: prognostic model development and validation Thumbnail


Authors

Dr TIM CARD tim.card@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Associate Professor

Profile image of HYWEL WILLIAMS

HYWEL WILLIAMS HYWEL.WILLIAMS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Dermato-Epidemiology

Christian D Mallen

Matthew D Stevenson

Richard Riley



Abstract

Background Sulfasalazine-induced cytopenia, nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity is uncommon during long-term treatment. Some guidelines recommend 3 monthly monitoring blood tests indefinitely during long-term treatment while others recommend stopping monitoring after 1 year. To rationalise monitoring, we developed and validated a prognostic model for clinically significant blood, liver or kidney toxicity during established sulfasalazine treatment. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting UK primary care. Data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Gold and Aurum formed independent development and validation cohorts. Participants Age ≥18 years, new diagnosis of an inflammatory condition and sulfasalazine prescription. Study period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2019. Outcome Sulfasalazine discontinuation with abnormal monitoring blood-test result. Analysis Patients were followed up from 6 months after first primary care prescription to the earliest of outcome, drug discontinuation, death, 5 years or 31 December 2019. Penalised Cox regression was performed to develop the risk equation. Multiple imputation handled missing predictor data. Model performance was assessed in terms of calibration and discrimination. Results 8936 participants were included in the development cohort (473 events, 23 299 person-years) and 5203 participants were included in the validation cohort (280 events, 12 867 person-years). Nine candidate predictors were included. The optimism adjusted R2D and Royston D statistic in the development data were 0.13 and 0.79, respectively. The calibration slope (95% CI) and Royston D statistic (95% CI) in validation cohort was 1.19 (0.96 to 1.43) and 0.87 (0.67 to 1.07), respectively. Conclusion This prognostic model for sulfasalazine toxicity uses readily available data and should be used to risk-stratify blood-test monitoring during established sulfasalazine treatment.

Citation

Abhishek, A., Grainge, M., Card, T., Williams, H. C., Taal, M. W., Aithal, G. P., …Riley, R. (2024). Risk-stratified monitoring for sulfasalazine toxicity: prognostic model development and validation. RMD Open, 10(1), Article e003980. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003980

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 30, 2024
Online Publication Date Mar 7, 2024
Publication Date 2024-01
Deposit Date Feb 16, 2024
Publicly Available Date Feb 16, 2024
Journal RMD Open
Electronic ISSN 2056-5933
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 10
Issue 1
Article Number e003980
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003980
Keywords Immunology; Immunology and Allergy; Rheumatology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/31450846
Publisher URL https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/10/1/e003980

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations