Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Short, medium, and long deferral of umbilical cord clamping compared with umbilical cord milking and immediate clamping at preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with individual participant data.

Seidler, Anna Lene; Libesman, Sol; Hunter, Kylie E; Barba, Angie; Aberoumand, Mason; Williams, Jonathan G; Shrestha, Nipun; Aagerup, Jannik; Sotiropoulos, James X; Montgomery, Alan A; Gyte, Gillian M L; Duley, Lelia; Askie, Lisa M

Authors

Anna Lene Seidler

Sol Libesman

Kylie E Hunter

Angie Barba

Mason Aberoumand

Jonathan G Williams

Nipun Shrestha

Jannik Aagerup

James X Sotiropoulos

Gillian M L Gyte

Lelia Duley

Lisa M Askie



Abstract

Background:

Deferred (also known as delayed) cord clamping can improve survival of infants born preterm (before 37 weeks of gestation), but the optimal duration of deferral remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis with the aim of comparing the effectiveness of umbilical cord clamping strategies with different timings of clamping or with cord milking for preterm infants.

Methods:

We searched medical databases and trial registries from inception until Feb 24, 2022 (updated June 6, 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing cord clamping strategies for preterm infants. Individual participant data were harmonised and assessed for risk of bias and quality. Interventions were grouped into immediate clamping, short deferral (≥15 s to <45 s), medium deferral (≥45 s to <120 s), long deferral (≥120 s), and intact cord milking. The primary outcome was death before hospital discharge. We calculated one-stage, intention-to-treat Bayesian random-effects individual participant data network meta-analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019136640.

Findings:

We included individual participant data from 47 trials with 6094 participants. Of all interventions, long deferral reduced death before discharge the most (compared with immediate clamping; odds ratio 0·31 [95% credibility interval] 0·11–0·80; moderate certainty). The risk of bias was low for 10 (33%) of 30 trials, 14 (47%) had some concerns, and 6 (20%) were rated as having a high risk of bias. Heterogeneity was low, with no indication of inconsistency.

Interpretation:

This study found that long deferral of clamping leads to reduced odds of death before discharge in preterm infants. In infants assessed as requiring immediate resuscitation, this finding might only be generalisable if there are provisions for such care with the cord intact. These results are based on thoroughly cleaned and checked individual participant data and can inform future guidelines and practice.

Citation

Seidler, A. L., Libesman, S., Hunter, K. E., Barba, A., Aberoumand, M., Williams, J. G., Shrestha, N., Aagerup, J., Sotiropoulos, J. X., Montgomery, A. A., Gyte, G. M. L., Duley, L., & Askie, L. M. (2023). Short, medium, and long deferral of umbilical cord clamping compared with umbilical cord milking and immediate clamping at preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with individual participant data. Lancet, 402(10418), 2223-2234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2823%2902469-8

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 2, 2023
Online Publication Date Nov 14, 2023
Publication Date Dec 9, 2023
Deposit Date May 12, 2025
Journal Lancet (London, England)
Print ISSN 0140-6736
Electronic ISSN 1474-547X
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 402
Issue 10418
Pages 2223-2234
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2823%2902469-8
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/28132977
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673623024698?via%3Dihub
Additional Information © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Other Repo URL https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/32376