Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction

Liesefeld, Heinrich R.; Lamy, Dominique; Gaspelin, Nicholas; Geng, Joy J.; Kerzel, Dirk; Schall, Jeffrey D.; Allen, Harriet A.; Anderson, Brian A.; Boettcher, Sage; Busch, Niko A.; Carlisle, Nancy B.; Colonius, Hans; Draschkow, Dejan; Egeth, Howard; Leber, Andrew B.; Müller, Hermann J.; Röer, Jan Philipp; Schubö, Anna; Slagter, Heleen A.; Theeuwes, Jan; Wolfe, Jeremy

Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction Thumbnail


Authors

Heinrich R. Liesefeld

Dominique Lamy

Nicholas Gaspelin

Joy J. Geng

Dirk Kerzel

Jeffrey D. Schall

HARRIET ALLEN H.A.Allen@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Lifespan Psychology

Brian A. Anderson

Sage Boettcher

Niko A. Busch

Nancy B. Carlisle

Hans Colonius

Dejan Draschkow

Howard Egeth

Andrew B. Leber

Hermann J. Müller

Jan Philipp Röer

Anna Schubö

Heleen A. Slagter

Jan Theeuwes

Jeremy Wolfe



Abstract

Hypothesis-driven research rests on clearly articulated scientific theories. The building blocks for communicating these theories are scientific terms. Obviously, communication – and thus, scientific progress – is hampered if the meaning of these terms varies idiosyncratically across (sub)fields and even across individual researchers within the same subfield. We have formed an international group of experts representing various theoretical stances with the goal to homogenize the use of the terms that are most relevant to fundamental research on visual distraction in visual search. Our discussions revealed striking heterogeneity and we had to invest much time and effort to increase our mutual understanding of each other’s use of central terms, which turned out to be strongly related to our respective theoretical positions. We present the outcomes of these discussions in a glossary and provide some context in several essays. Specifically, we explicate how central terms are used in the distraction literature and consensually sharpen their definitions in order to enable communication across theoretical standpoints. Where applicable, we also explain how the respective constructs can be measured. We believe that this novel type of adversarial collaboration can serve as a model for other fields of psychological research that strive to build a solid groundwork for theorizing and communicating by establishing a common language. For the field of visual distraction, the present paper should facilitate communication across theoretical standpoints and may serve as an introduction and reference text for newcomers.

Journal Article Type Review
Acceptance Date Nov 16, 2023
Online Publication Date Jan 4, 2024
Publication Date Jan 4, 2024
Deposit Date Nov 27, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jan 5, 2025
Journal Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Print ISSN 1943-3921
Electronic ISSN 1943-393X
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02820-3
Keywords Linguistics and Language; Sensory Systems; Language and Linguistics; Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/27858555
Publisher URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-023-02820-3

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations