Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheterisation: the ARCTIC randomised controlled feasibility trial

Clarke, Paul; Soe, Aung; Nichols, Amy; Harizaj, Helen; Webber, Mark A.; Linsell, Louise; Bell, Jennifer L.; Tremlett, Catherine; Muthukumar, Priyadarsini; Pattnayak, Santosh; Partlett, Christopher; King, Andrew; Juszczak, Ed; Heath, Paul T.

2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheterisation: the ARCTIC randomised controlled feasibility trial Thumbnail


Authors

Paul Clarke

Aung Soe

Amy Nichols

Helen Harizaj

Mark A. Webber

Louise Linsell

Jennifer L. Bell

Catherine Tremlett

Priyadarsini Muthukumar

Santosh Pattnayak

CHRIS PARTLETT Chris.Partlett@nottingham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor of Medical Statistics and Clinical Trials

Andrew King

Paul T. Heath



Abstract

Objective: Catheter-related sepsis (CRS) is a major complication with significant morbidity and mortality. Evidence is lacking regarding the most appropriate antiseptic for skin disinfection before percutaneous central venous catheter (PCVC) insertion in preterm neonates. To inform the feasibility and design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) of two antiseptic formulations, we conducted the Antiseptic Randomised Controlled Trial for Insertion of Catheters (ARCTIC) feasibility study to assess catheter colonisation, sepsis, and skin morbidity. Design: Feasibility RCT. Setting: Two UK tertiary-level neonatal intensive care units. Patients: Preterm infants born <34 weeks' gestation scheduled to undergo PCVC insertion. Interventions: Skin disinfection with either 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-aqueous or 2% CHG-70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) before PCVC insertion and at removal. Primary outcome: Proportion in the 2% CHG-70% IPA arm with a colonised catheter at removal. Main feasibility outcomes: Rates of: (1) CRS, catheter-associated sepsis (CAS), and CRS/CAS per 1,000 PCVC days; (2) recruitment and retention; (3) data completeness. Safety outcomes: Daily skin morbidity scores recorded from catheter insertion until 48 hours post-removal. Results: 116 babies were randomised. Primary outcome incidence was 4.1% (95% confidence interval: 0.9% to 11.5%). Overall catheter colonisation rate was 5.2% (5/97); CRS 2.3/1000 catheter days; CAS 14.8/1000 catheter days. Recruitment, retention and data completeness were good. No major antiseptic-related skin injury was reported. Conclusions: A definitive comparative efficacy trial is feasible, but the very low catheter colonisation rate would make a large-scale RCT challenging due to the very large sample size required. ARCTIC provides preliminary reassurance supporting potential safe use of 2% CHG-70% IPA and 2% CHG-aqueous in preterm neonates. Trial registration number: ISRCTN82571474.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 8, 2023
Online Publication Date Oct 31, 2023
Publication Date Oct 31, 2023
Deposit Date Nov 1, 2023
Publicly Available Date Nov 1, 2023
Journal Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Electronic ISSN 1468-2052
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-325871
Keywords Obstetrics and Gynecology; General Medicine; Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/26804135
Publisher URL https://fn.bmj.com/content/early/2023/10/31/archdischild-2023-325871