Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

PROSPECT methodology for developing procedure-specific pain management recommendations: an update

Joshi, G P; Albrecht, E; Van de Velde, M; Kehlet, H; Lobo, D N; PROSPECT Working Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy

Authors

G P Joshi

E Albrecht

M Van de Velde

H Kehlet

DILEEP LOBO dileep.lobo@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Gastrointestinal Surgery

PROSPECT Working Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy



Abstract

The procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) working group develops evidence-based pain management recommendations. PROSPECT methodology is unique and rigorous. However, several limitations were recognised that needed to be addressed, and several new factors were identified that improved PROSPECT methodology. The aim of this article is to present updated PROSPECT methodology for development of recommendations for procedure-specific pain management, focusing on the methodological revisions we will implement. In future, included randomised clinical trials will need to be prospectively registered on a publicly accessible clinical trials database and the study design, including the primary outcome in the registration, should coincide with that in the published manuscript. Placebo-controlled studies in which the analgesic intervention of interest is solely paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitors or opioids will not be included. Studies comparing one drug in a particular class with another in the same class will also not be included. Future projects will use the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for quality of reporting of methodology and results. A modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach will be used for grading of level of evidence and strength of recommendations. Finally, the updated PROSPECT methodology addresses several other limitations and implements new factors that all add rigour and transparency to developing procedure-specific pain management recommendations.

Citation

Joshi, G. P., Albrecht, E., Van de Velde, M., Kehlet, H., Lobo, D. N., & PROSPECT Working Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy. (2023). PROSPECT methodology for developing procedure-specific pain management recommendations: an update. Anaesthesia, 78(11), 1386-1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16135

Journal Article Type Review
Acceptance Date Aug 29, 2023
Online Publication Date Sep 26, 2023
Publication Date 2023-11
Deposit Date Sep 4, 2023
Publicly Available Date Sep 27, 2024
Journal Anaesthesia
Print ISSN 0003-2409
Electronic ISSN 1365-2044
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 78
Issue 11
Pages 1386-1392
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16135
Keywords Postoperative pain; analgesia; evidence-based medicine; recommendations; methodology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/25060302
Publisher URL https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16135
PMID 37751453
Additional Information This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Joshi, G.P., Albrecht, E., Van de Velde, M., Kehlet, H., Lobo, D.N. and (2023), PROSPECT methodology for developing procedure-specific pain management recommendations: an update. Anaesthesia, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16135. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library