Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Guided reciprocal questioning to support children's collaborative storytelling

Gelmini-Hornsby, Giulia; Ainsworth, Shaaron; O'Malley, Claire

Authors

Giulia Gelmini-Hornsby

Claire O'Malley



Abstract

Developing shared understanding is essential to productive collaboration where a product is jointly constructed. This is especially true when the different collaborators' contributions need to build coherently on one another, as, for example, when making a story together. This study investigated whether encouraging children to engage in discussion through a Guided Reciprocal Peer Questioning (GRPQ) script whilst drawing together leads to better collaborative storytelling. Thirty-six 6-7 year old children used a computer-drawing application called KidPad to tell collaborative stories supported by interactive drawings, and were trained in the GRPQ script. Using a within-subjects design, it was shown that the GRPQ script promoted engagement in interactive discussion and led to the production of richer and more coherent collaborative stories. Furthermore, this benefit was often maintained once the explicit support was withdrawn. These findings suggest that the GRPQ script is an effective way to improve children's collaborative storytelling and one that children can internalise and apply themselves. © 2011 International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.; Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.

Citation

Gelmini-Hornsby, G., Ainsworth, S., & O'Malley, C. (2011). Guided reciprocal questioning to support children's collaborative storytelling. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 577-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9129-5

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 5, 2011
Online Publication Date Sep 4, 2011
Publication Date Dec 1, 2011
Deposit Date Aug 5, 2024
Journal International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Print ISSN 1556-1607
Electronic ISSN 1556-1615
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 6
Issue 4
Pages 577-600
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9129-5
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/23577505
Publisher URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11412-011-9129-5