Professor SARAH LEWIS SARAH.LEWIS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF MEDICAL STATISTICS
Does cost feedback modify demand for common blood tests in secondary care? A prospective controlled intervention study
Lewis, Sarah; Young, Ben; Thurley, Peter; Shaw, Dominick; Cranwell, Jo; Skelly, Rob; Langley, Tessa; Norwood, Mark; Sturrock, Nigel DC; Fogarty, Andrew W
Authors
Ben Young
Peter Thurley
Dominick Shaw
Jo Cranwell
Rob Skelly
Dr TESSA LANGLEY TESSA.LANGLEY@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Mark Norwood
Nigel DC Sturrock
Dr ANDREW FOGARTY ANDREW.FOGARTY@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
CLINICAL ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR & READER IN CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Abstract
Background: Behavioural insights or ‘nudge’ theory suggests that non-directional interventions may be used to modify human behaviour. We have tested the hypothesis that the provision of the cost of common blood tests with their results may modify subsequent demand for blood assays.
Methods: The study design was a prospective controlled intervention study. The individual and annual institutional cost of full blood count (FBC), urea and electrolytes (U&E) and liver function test (LFT) blood assays were added to the electronic results system for inpatients at the intervention teaching hospital, but not the control hospital.
Results: In the 12 months after the intervention was implemented, demand for FBC dropped by 3% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1 to 5, p less than 0.001), U&E by 2% (95%CI: 0 to 4, p=0.054) and there was no change in demand for LFT compared to the control institution.
Conclusions: Providing cost feedback to clinicians for commonly used blood tests is a viable intervention that is associated with small reductions in demand for some, but not all blood assays. As this is an easily scalable approach, this has potential to enable efficient health care delivery, while also minimising the morbidity experienced by the patient.
Citation
Lewis, S., Young, B., Thurley, P., Shaw, D., Cranwell, J., Skelly, R., Langley, T., Norwood, M., Sturrock, N. D., & Fogarty, A. W. (2019). Does cost feedback modify demand for common blood tests in secondary care? A prospective controlled intervention study. Future Healthcare Journal, 6(3), 204-208. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0001
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 17, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 11, 2019 |
Publication Date | 2019-10 |
Deposit Date | Aug 1, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 12, 2020 |
Journal | Future Healthcare Journal |
Print ISSN | 2514-6645 |
Electronic ISSN | 2514-6653 |
Publisher | Royal College of Physicians |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 6 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 204-208 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0001 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2320074 |
Publisher URL | https://www.rcpjournals.org/content/futurehosp/6/3/204 |
Contract Date | Aug 1, 2019 |
Files
Blood Nudge Revise Second Final
(353 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search