Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Diagnostic Sensitivity of Unenhanced CT for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Can Clot Density Measurement Replace CT Venogram?

Chaudhary, Snehansh Roy; Chunara, Mohamed; McLeavy, Chris; Qayyum, Haisum; Cusack, James; Paton, David; Hare, James; Ganguly, Akash

Diagnostic Sensitivity of Unenhanced CT for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Can Clot Density Measurement Replace CT Venogram? Thumbnail


Authors

Snehansh Roy Chaudhary

Mohamed Chunara

Chris McLeavy

Haisum Qayyum

James Cusack

James Hare

Akash Ganguly



Abstract

Objectives Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is an important cause of stroke in young adults. Noncontrast-enhanced CT head (NECT) is almost always the first investigation. Our objectives were as follows:1. How accurately does venous sinus density on NECT predict the presence of clot on CT venogram (CTV)?2. Whether repeated measurements changed the confidence?3. How many venous sinus thrombus would be missed if we do not do a CTV?4. Can clot density measurement replace CTV? Methods Multicenter case-control study was designed with data from seven hospitals. Inclusion criteria: all CT and magnetic resonance imaging venograms with a prior NECT, performed between 1.1.2018 and 31.12.2018 (12 months), were included. Hounsfield unit (HU) values were calculated at the site of highest density on the NECT. Logistic regression analysis was performed using STATA. Result Two-hundred seventy-seven cases met the criteria with 33 positive cerebral venous thrombosis (density on NECT 60-92 HU) and 244 negative examinations (density on NECT 31-68 HU). Area under the curve for average clot density on NECT was 0.9984. Conclusion We found a strong relationship between sinus density on NECT and outcome of CTV. Repeating density measurements did not add any predictive value or changed outcome. Advances in Knowledge Density 70 HU or higher on NECT always resulted in a positive CTV but would miss a fifth of the positives. Cutoff at 60 HU would not miss any but result in significant false positives. An efficient option could be to limit CTV to sinus densities 60 to 70 HU only. However, a larger study would be required for such change in practice.

Citation

Chaudhary, S. R., Chunara, M., McLeavy, C., Qayyum, H., Cusack, J., Paton, D., …Ganguly, A. (2023). Diagnostic Sensitivity of Unenhanced CT for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Can Clot Density Measurement Replace CT Venogram?. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging, 33(02), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761184

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 8, 2022
Online Publication Date Feb 11, 2023
Publication Date 2023-04
Deposit Date Jun 22, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jun 22, 2023
Journal Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging
Print ISSN 0971-3026
Electronic ISSN 1998-3808
Publisher Medknow Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 33
Issue 02
Pages 187-194
DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761184
Keywords CT - density - head - unenhanced - venogram
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/17386203
Publisher URL https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0043-1761184

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations