Caroline Hartley
Analgesic efficacy and safety of morphine in the Procedural Pain in Premature Infants (Poppi) study: randomised placebo-controlled trial
Hartley, Caroline; Moultrie, Fiona; Hoskin, Amy; Green, Gabrielle; Monk, Vaneesha; Bell, Jennifer L.; King, Andrew R.; Buckle, Miranda; van der Vaart, Marianne; Gursul, Deniz; Goksan, Sezgi; Juszczak, Edmund; Norman, Jane E.; Rogers, Richard; Patel, Chetan; Adams, Eleri; Slater, Rebeccah
Authors
Fiona Moultrie
Amy Hoskin
Gabrielle Green
Vaneesha Monk
Jennifer L. Bell
Andrew R. King
Miranda Buckle
Marianne van der Vaart
Deniz Gursul
Sezgi Goksan
Professor ED JUSZCZAK ED.JUSZCZAK@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF CLINICAL TRIALS AND STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Jane E. Norman
Richard Rogers
Chetan Patel
Eleri Adams
Rebeccah Slater
Abstract
Background: Infant pain has immediate and long-term effects but is undertreated because of a paucity of evidence-based analgesics. Although morphine is often used to sedate ventilated infants, its analgesic efficacy is unclear. We aimed to establish whether oral morphine could provide effective and safe analgesia in non-ventilated premature infants for acute procedural pain. Methods: In this single-centre masked trial, 31 infants at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK, were randomly allocated using a web-based facility with a minimisation algorithm to either 100 μg/kg oral morphine sulphate or placebo 1 h before a clinically required heel lance and retinopathy of prematurity screening examination, on the same occasion. Eligible infants were born prematurely at less than 32 weeks' gestation or with a birthweight lower than 1501 g and had a gestational age of 34–42 weeks at the time of the study. The co-primary outcome measures were the Premature Infant Pain Profile–Revised (PIPP-R) score after retinopathy of prematurity screening and the magnitude of noxious-evoked brain activity after heel lancing. Secondary outcome measures assessed physiological stability and safety. This trial is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database (number 2014-003237-25). Findings: Between Oct 30, 2016, and Nov 17, 2017, 15 infants were randomly allocated to morphine and 16 to placebo; one infant assigned placebo was withdrawn from the study before monitoring began. The predefined stopping boundary was crossed, and trial recruitment stopped because of profound respiratory adverse effects of morphine without suggestion of analgesic efficacy. None of the co-primary outcome measures differed significantly between groups. PIPP-R score after retinopathy of prematurity screening was mean 11·1 (SD 3·2) with morphine and 10·5 (3·4) with placebo (mean difference 0·5, 95% CI −2·0 to 3·0; p=0·66). Noxious-evoked brain activity after heel lancing was median 0·99 (IQR 0·40–1·56) with morphine and 0·75 (0·33–1·22) with placebo (median difference 0·25, 95% CI −0·16 to 0·80; p=0·25). Interpretation: Administration of oral morphine (100 μg/kg) to non-ventilated premature infants has the potential for harm without analgesic efficacy. We do not recommend oral morphine for retinopathy of prematurity screening and strongly advise caution if considering its use for other acute painful procedures in non-ventilated premature infants. Funding: Wellcome Trust and National Institute for Health Research.
Citation
Hartley, C., Moultrie, F., Hoskin, A., Green, G., Monk, V., Bell, J. L., King, A. R., Buckle, M., van der Vaart, M., Gursul, D., Goksan, S., Juszczak, E., Norman, J. E., Rogers, R., Patel, C., Adams, E., & Slater, R. (2018). Analgesic efficacy and safety of morphine in the Procedural Pain in Premature Infants (Poppi) study: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 392(10164), 2595-2605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2818%2931813-0
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 1, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 30, 2018 |
Publication Date | Dec 15, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Jan 29, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 31, 2024 |
Journal | The Lancet |
Print ISSN | 0140-6736 |
Electronic ISSN | 1474-547X |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 392 |
Issue | 10164 |
Pages | 2595-2605 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2818%2931813-0 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/17088808 |
Publisher URL | https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31813-0/fulltext |
Related Public URLs | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673618318130 |
Files
PIIS0140673618318130
(959 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Reporting of Factorial Randomized Trials: Extension of the CONSORT 2010 Statement
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search