Splitting hairs? Is it discrimination? James Marson & Katy Ferris examine the different approaches of the court to mistreatment on grounds of nationality & immigration status
Marson, James; Ferris, Katy
In Brief: In Taiwo v Olaigbe and another: Onu v Akwiwu and another the Supreme Court had to decide whether the appellants suffered mistreatment on the basis of their nationality (protected by s13(1) of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010)) or due to their vulnerable immigration status (not protected).
The case of Taiwo v Olaigbe and another: Onu v Akwiwu and another  UKSC 31,  All ER (D) 134 (Jun) involved the mistreatment of migrant domestic workers by their employers and whether such action amounted to direct or indirect race discrimination.
Marson, J., & Ferris, K. (2016). Splitting hairs? Is it discrimination? James Marson & Katy Ferris examine the different approaches of the court to mistreatment on grounds of nationality & immigration status. New Law Journal, 166(7710), 10-11
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Jul 6, 2016|
|Online Publication Date||Jun 6, 2016|
|Publication Date||Aug 5, 2016|
|Deposit Date||Mar 12, 2019|
|Publicly Available Date||Apr 4, 2019|
|Publisher||New Law Journal|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Additional Information||Reproduced by permission of © LexisNexis|
You might also like
Applying Refugee Family Reunion Law Therapeutically
For the Want of Certainty: Vnuk , Juliana and Andrade and the Obligation to Insure
Collective redress: broadening EU enforcement through state liability?