Muhammad Awwal Ladan
eHealth adoption and use among healthcare professionals in a tertiary hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Qmethodology study
Ladan, Muhammad Awwal; Wharrad, Heather; Windle, Richard
Authors
Professor HEATHER WHARRAD HEATHER.WHARRAD@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF E-LEARNING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS
Professor RICHARD WINDLE richard.windle@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF DIGITAL LEARNING
Abstract
Copyright 2019 Ladan et al. Background. The aim of the study was to explore the viewpoints of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the adoption and use of eHealth in clinical practice in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Information and communication technologies (ICTs) including eHealth provide HCPs the opportunity to provide quality healthcare to their patients while also improving their own clinical practices. Despite this, previous research has identified these technologies have their associated challenges when adopting them for clinical practice. But more research is needed to identify how these eHealth resources influence clinical practice. In addition, there is still little information about adoption and use of these technologies by HCPs inclinical practice in Sub-Saharan Africa. Method. An exploratory descriptive design was adopted for this study. Thirty-six (36) HCPs (18 nurses and 18 physicians) working in the clinical area in a tertiary health institution in SSA participated in this study. Using Qmethodology, study participants rank-ordered forty-six statementsin relation to their adoption and use of eHealth within their clinical practice.This was analysed using by-person factor analysis and complemented with audio-taped interviews. Results. The analysis yielded four factors i.e., distinct viewpoints the HCPs hold about adoption and use of eHealth within their clinical practice. These factors include: Patient-focused eHealth advocates" who use the eHealth because they are motivated by patients and their families preferences; Task-focused eHealth advocates" use eHealth because it helps them complete clinical tasks; Traditionalistic-pragmatists" recognise contributions eHealth makes in clinical practice but separate from their routine clinical activities; and the Tech-focused eHealth advocates" who use the eHealth because they are motivated by the technology itself. Conclusion. The study shows the equivocal viewpoints that HCPs have about eHealth within their clinical practice. This, in addition to adding to existing literature, will help policymakers/decision makers to consider HCPs views about these technologies prior to implementing an eHealth resource.
Citation
Ladan, M. A., Wharrad, H., & Windle, R. (2019). eHealth adoption and use among healthcare professionals in a tertiary hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Qmethodology study. PeerJ, 7, Article e6326. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6326
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 21, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 19, 2019 |
Publication Date | Apr 19, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Mar 7, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 7, 2019 |
Journal | PeerJ |
Electronic ISSN | 2167-8359 |
Publisher | PeerJ |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 7 |
Article Number | e6326 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6326 |
Keywords | General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; General Neuroscience; General Agricultural and Biological Sciences; General Medicine |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1615889 |
Publisher URL | https://peerj.com/articles/6326/ |
Contract Date | Mar 7, 2019 |
Files
eHealth adoption and use among healthcare professionals in a tertiary hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Qmethodology study
(507 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Foot care intervention delivered by community health worker (CHWs): A scoping review
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search