Rita Faria
How does cholesterol burden change the case for investing in familial hypercholesterolaemia? A cost-effectiveness analysis
Faria, Rita; Saramago, Pedro; Cox, Edward; Weng, Stephen; Iyen, Barbara; Akyea, Ralph K; Humphries, Steve E; Qureshi, Nadeem; Woods, Beth
Authors
Pedro Saramago
Edward Cox
Stephen Weng
BARBARA IYEN Barbara.Iyen2@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Associate Professor in Primary Care
Dr RALPH AKYEA RALPH.AKYEA1@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Senior Research Fellow
Steve E Humphries
Professor NADEEM QURESHI nadeem.qureshi@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Professor
Beth Woods
Abstract
Background and aims
This study aimed to ascertain how the long-term benefits and costs of diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) vary by prognostic factors and ‘cholesterol burden’, which is the effect of long-term exposure to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
Methods
A new cost-effectiveness model was developed from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS), informed by routine data from individuals with FH. The primary outcome was net health gain (i.e., health benefits net of the losses due to costs), expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at the £15,000/QALY threshold. Prognostic factors included pre-treatment LDL-C, age, gender, and CVD history.
Results
If cholesterol burden is considered, diagnosis resulted in positive net health gain (i.e., it is cost-effective) in all individuals with pre-treatment LDL-C ≥ 4 mmol/L, and in those with pre-treatment LDL-C ≥ 2 mmol/L aged ≥50 years or who have CVD history. If cholesterol burden is not considered, diagnosis resulted in lower net health gain, but still positive in children aged 10 years with pre-treatment LDL-C ≥ 6 mmol/L and adults aged 30 years with pre-treatment LDL-C ≥ 4 mmol/L.
Conclusions
Diagnosis and treatment of most people with FH results in large net health gains, particularly in those with higher pre-treatment LDL-C. Economic evaluations of FH interventions should consider the sensitivity of the study conclusions to cholesterol burden, particularly where interventions target younger patients, and explicitly consider prognostic factors such as pre-treatment LDL-C, age, and CVD history.
Citation
Faria, R., Saramago, P., Cox, E., Weng, S., Iyen, B., Akyea, R. K., …Woods, B. (2023). How does cholesterol burden change the case for investing in familial hypercholesterolaemia? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Atherosclerosis, 367, 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.12.001
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 6, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 29, 2022 |
Publication Date | 2023-02 |
Deposit Date | Dec 15, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 29, 2022 |
Journal | Atherosclerosis |
Print ISSN | 0021-9150 |
Electronic ISSN | 1879-1484 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 367 |
Pages | 40-47 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.12.001 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/14890450 |
Publisher URL | https://www.atherosclerosis-journal.com/article/S0021-9150(22)01557-X/fulltext |
Files
Faria Manuscript 19.11.2022
(365 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search