Dr YASUHIRO KOTERA YASUHIRO.KOTERA@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Dr YASUHIRO KOTERA YASUHIRO.KOTERA@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Dr STEFAN RENNICK EGGLESTONE stefan.egglestone@nottingham.ac.uk
Principal Research Fellow
Dr FIONA NG FIONA.NG@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Principal Research Fellow
Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley
Yasmin Ali
Dr CHRISTOPHER NEWBY Christopher.Newby@nottingham.ac.uk
SENIOR QUANTITATIVE METHODS ADVISER AND RESEARCHER
Dr CAROLINE FOX Caroline.Fox@nottingham.ac.uk
ANNE MCLAREN FELLOW
Caroline Yeo
Emily Slade
Simon Bradstreet
Julian Harrison
Donna Franklin
Dr OLAMIDE TODOWEDE OLAMIDE.TODOWEDE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
RESEARCH FELLOW
Professor MIKE SLADE M.SLADE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF MENTAL HEALTH RECOVERY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION
Demand for digital health interventions is increasing in many countries. The use of recorded mental health recovery narratives in digital health interventions is becoming more widespread in clinical practice. Mental health recovery narratives are first-person lived experience accounts of recovery from mental health problems, including struggles and successes over time. Helpful impacts of recorded mental health recovery narratives include connectedness with the narrative and validation of experiences. Possible harms include feeling disconnected and excluded from others. Diverse narrative collections from many types of narrators and describing multiple ways to recover are important to maximize the opportunity for service users to benefit through connection and to minimize the likelihood of harm. Mental health clinicians need to know whether narrative collections are sufficiently diverse to recommend to service users. However, no method exists for assessing the diversity and inclusivity of existing or new narrative collections. We argue that assessing diversity and inclusivity is the next frontier in mental health recovery narrative research and practice. This is important, but methodologically and ethically complex. In this viewpoint, we propose and evaluate one diversity and two inclusivity assessment methods. The diversity assessment method involves use of the Simpson Diversity Index. The two inclusivity assessment methods are based on comparator demographic rates and arbitrary thresholds, respectively. These methods were applied to four narrative collections as a case study. Refinements are needed regarding a narrative assessment tool in terms of its practicality and cultural adaptation.
Kotera, Y., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Ng, F., Llewellyn-Beardsley, J., Ali, Y., Newby, C., Fox, C., Yeo, C., Slade, E., Bradstreet, S., Harrison, J., Franklin, D., Todowede, O., & Slade, M. (2023). Assessing Diversity and Inclusivity is the Next Frontier in Mental Health Recovery Narrative Research and Practice. JMIR Mental Health, 10, Article e44601. https://doi.org/10.2196/44601
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 1, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 17, 2023 |
Publication Date | 2023 |
Deposit Date | Jan 5, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 5, 2023 |
Journal | JMIR Mental Health |
Electronic ISSN | 2368-7959 |
Publisher | JMIR Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 10 |
Article Number | e44601 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.2196/44601 |
Keywords | curation, collective action, mental health, diversity, telemedicine, recovery narrative, inclusivity, clinical practice, narrative research, digital health, web-based mental health interventions, demographic |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/14602531 |
Publisher URL | https://mental.jmir.org/2023/1/e44601 |
Related Public URLs | https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/44601 |
PDF
(341 Kb)
PDF
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Applying Critical Discourse Analysis to Cross-Cultural Mental Health Recovery Research: Positive Changes and No Value Judgement
(2024)
Preprint / Working Paper
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search