Mr KYLE HARRINGTON KYLE.HARRINGTON@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
Decision-making within missing person search
Harrington, Kyle; Brown, Michael; Pinchin, James; Sharples, Sarah
Authors
Michael Brown
Dr JAMES PINCHIN JAMES.PINCHIN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
Professor SARAH SHARPLES SARAH.SHARPLES@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF HUMAN FACTORS
Abstract
This paper reports the findings of a series of interviews with search and rescue volunteers. Participants were asked to recall accounts of particular incidents which involved searching for a missing adult who could be considered ‘vulnerable’. The purpose of this study was to discover what types of decisions are made during missing incidents; including a consideration of the factors which affect these decisions and the main focuses of attention throughout the incident. Such an understanding may help to shed light on best practices which could inform decision-making support tools for families of the missing and identify the user-requirements of a future technology designed to help find missing people. Interviews were conducted using the critical decision method (CDM) to elicit specific information about the decisions and challenges faced by search and rescue teams during missing person searches. Critical decision points were identified and sequenced for each incident. Emergent thematic analysis (EMA) was applied to the transcripts to identify themes across various incidents; these themes were explored in detail using a mixed-method approach. This study builds upon the methodological approach of CDM using a two-tiered approach to analysis which seeks to discover the focus of practitioners’ attention as they progress through missing person searches. A decision-sequence diagram was created to clearly show the sequence of each decision and trends across all incidents; a table was produced to show the relative importance of each aspect across decisions. Finally, strengths and weaknesses of this approach to incident analysis are discussed.
Citation
Harrington, K., Brown, M., Pinchin, J., & Sharples, S. (2018). Decision-making within missing person search. Cognition, Technology and Work, 20(4), 665-680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0515-x
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 13, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 30, 2018 |
Publication Date | 2018-11 |
Deposit Date | Nov 1, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 1, 2018 |
Journal | Cognition, Technology & Work |
Print ISSN | 1435-5558 |
Electronic ISSN | 1435-5566 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 20 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 665-680 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0515-x |
Keywords | Philosophy; Human-Computer Interaction; Computer Science Applications |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1217250 |
Publisher URL | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10111-018-0515-x |
Contract Date | Nov 1, 2018 |
Files
Harrington2018_Article_Decision-makingWithinMissingPe
(1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search