Rachael Potter
Analytical review of the Australian policy context for work-related psychological health and psychosocial risks
Potter, Rachael; O'Keeffe, Valerie; Leka, Stavroula; Dollard, Maureen; Webber, Mardi
Authors
Valerie O'Keeffe
Stavroula Leka
Maureen Dollard
Mardi Webber
Abstract
Psychosocial hazards and risks are widely acknowledged to be a serious challenge in WHS. WHS regulatory (hard law) and non-regulatory binding (soft law) policies should strive to engage organisations in psychosocial risk management practices and set a standard for good psychological health in the workplace. Therefore, policies should contain key definitions and aspects of good-practice psychosocial risk management principles. However, at present there has been limited review on policy in this area, despite growing evidence of poor work-related psychological health. Using qualitative methods, the current paper reviews relevant regulatory and non-regulatory policy documents and conducts a gap analysis according to criteria identified in models of good psychosocial risk management practice. The paper extends upon European research by Leka et al. (2015) and examines 39 policies (6 regulatory and 33 non-regulatory) in Australia. We found that most policy documents included psychological health in the objective of the policy. Moreover, non-regulatory policies showed sound coverage of exposure factors and preventive actions and, to a slightly lesser degree, risk assessment. Non-regulatory policy documents scored higher than regulatory policies. Within regulatory policies, there is poor inclusion of risk assessment, preventive action and poor coverage of exposure factors and psychological health outcomes. All policies could be strengthened by including greater coverage of work-related psychological health problems/disorders and associated outcomes. This is a novel review, which contributes to a broader program of research on Australian WHS policy. The next research phase seeks detailed information from WHS experts about the effectiveness and/or implementation of these policies in order to ascertain potential improvements.
Citation
Potter, R., O'Keeffe, V., Leka, S., Dollard, M., & Webber, M. (2019). Analytical review of the Australian policy context for work-related psychological health and psychosocial risks. Safety Science, 111, 37-48. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.09.012
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 24, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 27, 2018 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Sep 26, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 28, 2020 |
Print ISSN | 0925-7535 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 111 |
Pages | 37-48 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.09.012 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1134848 |
Files
Analytical Review of the Australian Policy Context for Work-Related Psychological Health and Psychosocial Risks
(<nobr>913 Kb</nobr>)
PDF