Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Probe-Specific Procedure to Estimate Sensitivity and Detection Limits for 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Faas, Henryk; Taylor, Alexander J.; Granwehr, Josef; Lesbats, Cl�mentine; Krupa, James L.; Six, Joseph S.; Pavlovskaya, Galina E.; Thomas, Neil R.; Auer, Dorothee P.; Meersmann, Thomas

Authors

Henryk Faas

Alexander J. Taylor

Josef Granwehr

Cl�mentine Lesbats

James L. Krupa

Joseph S. Six

NEIL THOMAS neil.thomas@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Medicinal and Biological Chemistry

DOROTHEE AUER dorothee.auer@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Neuroimaging

THOMAS MEERSMANN thomas.meersmann@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Translational Imaging



Contributors

Wolfgang Rudolf Bauer
Editor

Abstract

© 2016 Taylor et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Due to low fluorine background signal in vivo, 19F is a good marker to study the fate of exogenous molecules by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using equilibrium nuclear spin polarization schemes. Since 19F MRI applications require high sensitivity, it can be important to assess experimental feasibility during the design stage already by estimating the minimum detectable fluorine concentration. Here we propose a simple method for the calibration of MRI hardware, providing sensitivity estimates for a given scanner and coil configuration. An experimental "calibration factor" to account for variations in coil configuration and hardware set-up is specified. Once it has been determined in a calibration experiment, the sensitivity of an experiment or, alternatively, the minimum number of required spins or the minimum marker concentration can be estimated without the need for a pilot experiment. The definition of this calibration factor is derived based on standard equations for the sensitivity in magnetic resonance, yet the method is not restricted by the limited validity of these equations, since additional instrument-dependent factors are implicitly included during calibration. The method is demonstrated using MR spectroscopy and imaging experiments with different 19F samples, both paramagnetically and susceptibility broadened, to approximate a range of realistic environments.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 13, 2016
Online Publication Date Oct 11, 2016
Publication Date Oct 12, 2016
Deposit Date Feb 22, 2018
Journal PLoS ONE
Electronic ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 11
Issue 10
Pages e0163704
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163704
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1118447
Publisher URL https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163704
PMID 27727294