Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A study of T1 relaxation time as a measure of liver fibrosis and the influence of confounding histological factors

Hoad, Caroline L.; Palaniyappan, Naaventhan; Kaye, Philip; Chernova, Yulia; James, Martin W.; Costigan, Carolyn; Austin, Andrew; Marciani, Luca; Gowland, Penny A.; Guha, Indra N.; Francis, Susan; Aithal, Guruprasad P.

Authors

CAROLINE HOAD CAROLINE.L.HOAD@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Senior Research Fellow

Philip Kaye

Yulia Chernova

Martin W. James

Carolyn Costigan

Andrew Austin

Profile image of LUCA MARCIANI

LUCA MARCIANI LUCA.MARCIANI@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Gastrointestinal Imaging

Profile image of NEIL GUHA

NEIL GUHA neil.guha@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Hepatology



Abstract

Liver biopsy is the standard test for the assessment of fibrosis in liver tissue of patients with chronic liver disease. Recent studies have used a non‐invasive measure of T1 relaxation time to estimate the degree of fibrosis in a single slice of the liver. Here, we extend this work to measure T1 of the whole liver and investigate the effects of additional histological factors such as steatosis, inflammation and iron accumulation on the relationship between liver T1 and fibrosis. We prospectively enrolled patients who had previously undergone liver biopsy to have MR scans. A non‐breath‐holding, fast scanning protocol was used to acquire MR relaxation time data (T1 and T2*), and blood serum was used to determine the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score. Areas under the receiver operator curves (AUROCs) for T1 to detect advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were derived in a training cohort and then validated in a second cohort. Combining the cohorts, the influence of various histology factors on liver T1 relaxation time was investigated. The AUROCs (95% confidence interval (CI)) for detecting advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 3) and cirrhosis (F = 4) for the training cohort were 0.81 (0.65–0.96) and 0.92 (0.81–1.0) respectively (p 

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 11, 2015
Online Publication Date Apr 24, 2015
Publication Date Jun 1, 2015
Deposit Date Aug 29, 2018
Print ISSN 0952-3480
Electronic ISSN 1099-1492
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 28
Issue 6
Pages 706-714
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3299
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1103421
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/nbm.3299
PMID 25908098