Louise Abigail Dennis
The Productive use of Failure to Generate Witnesses from Divergent Proof Attempts for Coinduction
Dennis, Louise Abigail; Bundy, Alan; Green, Ian
Coinduction is a proof rule. It is the dual of induction. It allows reasoning about non--well--founded structures such as lazy lists or streams and is of particular use for reasoning about equivalences. A central difficulty in the automation of coinductive proof is the choice of a relation (called a bisimulation).
We present an automation of coinductive theorem proving. This automation is based on the idea of proof planning. Proof planning constructs the higher level steps in a proof, using knowledge of the general structure of a family of proofs and exploiting this knowledge to control the proof search. Part of proof planning involves the use of failure information to modify the plan by the use of a proof critic which exploits the information gained from the failed proof attempt.
Our approach to the problem was to develop a strategy that makes an initial simple guess at a bisimulation and then uses generalisation techniques, motivated by a critic, to refine this guess, so that a larger class of coinductive problems can be automatically verified.
The implementation of this strategy has focused on the use of coinduction to prove the equivalence of programs in a small lazy functional language which is similar to Haskell.
We have developed a proof plan for coinduction and a critic associated with this proof plan. These have been implemented in CoClam, an extended version of Clam with encouraging results. The planner has been successfully tested on a number of theorems.
Dennis, L. A., Bundy, A., & Green, I. (2000). The Productive use of Failure to Generate Witnesses from Divergent Proof Attempts for Coinduction. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 29(1-4),
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Jan 1, 2000|
|Deposit Date||Dec 8, 2005|
|Publicly Available Date||Oct 9, 2007|
|Journal||Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Copyright Statement||Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf|
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf