Mr JONATHAN HOUDMONT JONATHAN.HOUDMONT@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
Mr JONATHAN HOUDMONT JONATHAN.HOUDMONT@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
Tom Cox
Amanda Griffiths
Background: There is concern about lack of consistency in the design of case definitions used to measure work-related stress in national workforce surveys and the implications of this for the reliability and validity of prevalence estimates as well as for developments in policy and practice on tackling work-related stress.
Aims: To examine associations between case definitions used for the measurement of work-related stress in nationally representative workforce surveys and the prevalence rates generated.
Methods: The study focused on 18 nationally representative workforce surveys conducted between 1995 and 2008 that involved British samples. The published report from each survey was scrutinized for evidence of the case definition used to measure work-related stress and the associated prevalence rate.
Results: Several types of case definition were identified that differed in terms of their theoretical basis, structure, and content. Each was associated with a unique range of prevalence rates.
Conclusions: The results illustrate the challenge presented to the production of valid and reliable estimates of the scale of work-related stress by inconsistent case definition design. The imperative for theory-based consistency in the design of case definitions used for the measurement of work-related stress in national workforce surveys is highlighted.
Houdmont, J., Cox, T., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Work-related stress case definitions and prevalence rates in national surveys. Occupational Medicine, 60(8), https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq138
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Dec 1, 2010 |
Deposit Date | Jan 11, 2011 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 11, 2011 |
Journal | Occupational Medicine |
Print ISSN | 0962-7480 |
Electronic ISSN | 1471-8405 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 60 |
Issue | 8 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq138 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1011571 |
Publisher URL | http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/8/658 |
Additional Information | This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Occupational Medicine following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version: J. Houdmont, T. Cox and A. Griffiths, Work-related stress case definitions and prevalence rates in national surveys, Occupational Medicine, 2010, 60(8), 658-661, is available online at: http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/8/658 |
Houdmont_et_al_for_eprint_repository.pdf
(45 Kb)
PDF
Management standards and burnout among surgeons in the United Kingdom
(2023)
Journal Article
A systematic review of dentists' psychological wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic
(2023)
Journal Article
Identification of Surgeon Burnout via a Single-Item Measure
(2022)
Journal Article
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search