Gavin Brookes
Ink not mink: Discourses of Masculinity in Animal Rights Campaigns
Brookes, Gavin; Chałupnik, Małgorzata
Authors
Dr MALGORZATA CHALUPNIK Malgorzata.Chalupnik@nottingham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
Contributors
Mark McGlashan
Editor
John Mercer
Editor
Abstract
This chapter examines how discourses around masculinity are invoked in animal rights campaigns. We taking as our data source two parallel campaigns produced by the animal rights group, PETA: the “I'd rather go naked” campaign and the “Ink not mink” campaign. We subject posters produced as part of both of these parallel campaigns to a critical multimodal discourse analysis. Specifically, our analysis focuses on the representations of male and female social actors in these texts. We demonstrate that the campaigns provide decidedly gendered depictions of the represented participants, and ones which simultaneously draw upon and perpetuate a patriarchal gender system, notably presenting the male participants according to hegemonic masculine norms while the female participants are construed in relatively objectifying and passivising ways. The ultimate aim of these campaigns is, of course, to challenge animal exploitation. However, when viewed through an ecofeminist lens, the discourses which underpin and are perpetuated by these campaign texts can be interpreted as (unintentionally) helping to sustain a patriarchal hierarchy which is toxic in the sense that it enables the oppression of people and animals alike.
Citation
Brookes, G., & Chałupnik, M. (2023). Ink not mink: Discourses of Masculinity in Animal Rights Campaigns. In M. McGlashan, & J. Mercer (Eds.), Toxic Masculinity: Men, Meaning, and Digital Media (87-109). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003263883-7
Online Publication Date | Jan 31, 2023 |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2023 |
Deposit Date | Aug 15, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 1, 2024 |
Pages | 87-109 |
Book Title | Toxic Masculinity: Men, Meaning, and Digital Media |
Chapter Number | 6 |
ISBN | 9781032027067; 9781032205007 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003263883-7 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/10075245 |
Related Public URLs | https://www.routledge.com/Toxic-Masculinity-Men-Meaning-and-Digital-Media/Mercer-McGlashan/p/book/9781032027067 |
Additional Information | This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Toxic Masculinity Men, Meaning, and Digital Media on 30 December 2022, available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003263883/toxic-masculinity-mark-mcglashan-john-mercer |
Contract Date | Jun 2, 2022 |
Files
BrookesChalupnik2022 Accepted
(689 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
'You said, we did': A corpus-based analysis of marketising discourse in healthcare websites
(2021)
Journal Article
(Im)politeness and gender
(2017)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search