Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The island–mainland species turnover relationship

Stuart, Yoel E.; Losos, Jonathan B.; Algar, Adam C.

Authors

Yoel E. Stuart

Jonathan B. Losos

Adam C. Algar



Abstract

Many oceanic islands are notable for their high endemism, suggesting that islands may promote unique assembly processes. However, mainland assemblages sometimes harbour comparable levels of endemism, suggesting that island biotas may not be as unique as is often assumed. Here, we test the uniqueness of island biotic assembly by comparing the rate of species turnover among islands and the mainland, after accounting for distance decay and environmental gradients. We modelled species turnover as a function of geographical and environmental distance for mainland (M–M) communities of Anolis lizards and Terrarana frogs, two clades that have diversified extensively on Caribbean islands and the mainland Neotropics. We compared mainland–island (M–I) and island–island (I–I) species turnover with predictions of the M–M model. If island assembly is not unique, then the M–M model should successfully predict M–I and I–I turnover, given geographical and environmental distance. We found that M–I turnover and, to a lesser extent, I–I turnover were significantly higher than predicted for both clades. Thus, in the first quantitative comparison of mainland–island species turnover, we confirm the long-held but untested assumption that island assemblages accumulate biodiversity differently than their mainland counterparts.

Citation

Stuart, Y. E., Losos, J. B., & Algar, A. C. (2012). The island–mainland species turnover relationship. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1744), https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0816

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Oct 1, 2012
Deposit Date Mar 28, 2014
Publicly Available Date Mar 28, 2014
Journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Print ISSN 0962-8452
Electronic ISSN 0962-8452
Publisher The Royal Society
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 279
Issue 1744
DOI https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0816
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1006569
Publisher URL http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/279/1744/4071.full

Files





Downloadable Citations