All Outputs (6)

The clinical and cost effectiveness of a STAndardised DIagnostic Assessment for children and adolescents with emotional difficulties (STADIA); multi- centre randomised controlled trial (2024)
Journal Article
Sayal, K., Wyatt, L., Partlett, C., Ewart, C., Bhardwaj, A., Dubicka, B., Marshall, T., Gledhill, J., Lang, A., Sprange, K., Thomson, L., Moody, S., Holt, G., Bould, H., Upton, C., Keane, M., Cox, E., James, M., & Montgomery, A. (in press). The clinical and cost effectiveness of a STAndardised DIagnostic Assessment for children and adolescents with emotional difficulties (STADIA); multi- centre randomised controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,

Using online methods to recruit participants into mental health clinical trials: considerations and recommendations from the RE-MIND study (2024)
Journal Article
Iflaifel, M., Hall, C. L., Green, H. R., Willis, A., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Juszczak, E., Townsend, M., Martin, J., & Sprange, K. (2024). Using online methods to recruit participants into mental health clinical trials: considerations and recommendations from the RE-MIND study. Trials, 25, Article 596. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08435-9

Background: Ensuring diversity in clinical trials can be a challenge, which may be exacerbated when recruiting vulnerable populations, such as participants with mental health illness. As recruitment continues to be the major cause of trial delays, re... Read More about Using online methods to recruit participants into mental health clinical trials: considerations and recommendations from the RE-MIND study.

Current usage of explainer animations in trials: a survey of the UKCRC registered clinical trial units in the UK (2024)
Journal Article
Barber, V. S., Calvert, C., Appelbe, D., Sprange, K., Nollett, C., Tanner, S., & Richards, D. B. (2024). Current usage of explainer animations in trials: a survey of the UKCRC registered clinical trial units in the UK. Trials, 25(1), Article 224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08060-6

Background: Explainer animations are a means to communicate aspects of clinical trials to participants in a more engaging and accessible way. Delivered well these have the potential to enhance recruitment and retention. The range of media technology... Read More about Current usage of explainer animations in trials: a survey of the UKCRC registered clinical trial units in the UK.

Choosing and evaluating randomisation methods in clinical trials: a qualitative study (2024)
Journal Article
Bruce, C. L., Iflaifel, M., Montgomery, A., Ogollah, R., Sprange, K., & Partlett, C. (2024). Choosing and evaluating randomisation methods in clinical trials: a qualitative study. Trials, 25(1), Article 199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08005-z

Background: There exist many different methods of allocating participants to treatment groups during a randomised controlled trial. Although there is research that explores trial characteristics that are associated with the choice of method, there is... Read More about Choosing and evaluating randomisation methods in clinical trials: a qualitative study.

Recording harms in randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions: a qualitative study of UK clinical trials units and NIHR trial investigators (2024)
Journal Article
Papaioannou, D., Sprange, K., Hamer-Kiwacz, S., Mooney, C., Moody, G., & Cooper, C. (2024). Recording harms in randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions: a qualitative study of UK clinical trials units and NIHR trial investigators. Trials, 25(1), Article 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-07978-1

Background: Harms, also known as adverse events (AEs), are recorded and monitored in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to ensure participants’ safety. Harms are recorded poorly or inconsistently in RCTs of Behaviour Change Interventions (BCI); howe... Read More about Recording harms in randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions: a qualitative study of UK clinical trials units and NIHR trial investigators.

Recording harms in randomized controlled trials of behavior change interventions: a scoping review and map of the evidence (2024)
Journal Article
Papaioannou, D., Hamer-Kiwacz, S., Mooney, C., Cooper, C., O'Cathain, A., Sprange, K., & Moody, G. (2024). Recording harms in randomized controlled trials of behavior change interventions: a scoping review and map of the evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 169, Article 111275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111275

Objectives: Randomized controlled trials evaluate diverse interventions. This can include medical interventions such as drugs or surgical procedures, or behavior change interventions (BCIs) that aim to change a habit, belief, or attitude to improve h... Read More about Recording harms in randomized controlled trials of behavior change interventions: a scoping review and map of the evidence.