Iain Stewart
Are working practices of lung cancer nurse specialists associated with variation in peoples’ receipt of anticancer therapy?
Stewart, Iain; Khakwani, Aamir; Hubbard, Richard B.; Beckett, Paul; Borthwick, Diana; Tod, Angela; Leary, Alison; Tata, Laila J.
Authors
Aamir Khakwani
Richard B. Hubbard
Paul Beckett
Diana Borthwick
Angela Tod
Alison Leary
Dr LAILA TATA laila.tata@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Epidemiology
Abstract
Objectives
Treatment choices for people with lung cancer may be influenced by contact and engagement with lung cancer nurse specialists (LCNSs). We investigated how service factors, LCNS workload, and LCNS working practices may influence the receipt of anticancer treatment.
Materials and methods
English National Lung Cancer Audit data and inpatient Hospital Episode Statistics for 109,079 people with lung cancer surviving 30 days from diagnosis were linked along with LCNS workforce census data and a bespoke nationwide LCNS survey. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine adjusted relative risk ratios (RRRs) for receipt of anticancer therapies associated with LCNS assessment, LCNS workforce composition, caseload, LCNS reported working practices, treatment facilities at the patients’ attending hospitals, and the size of the lung cancer service.
Results
Assessment by an LCNS was the strongest independent predictor for receipt of anticancer therapy, with early LCNS assessments being particularly associated with greater receipt of surgery (RRR 1.85, 95%CI 1.63–2.11). For people we considered clinically suitable for surgery, receipt was 55%. Large LCNS caseloads were associated with decreased receipt of surgery among suitable patients (RRR 0.71, 95%CI 0.51–0.97) for caseloads >250 compared to ≤150. Reported LCNS working practices were associated with receipt of surgery, particularly provision of psychological support (RRR 1.60, 95%CI 1.02–2.51) and social support (RRR 1.56, 95%CI 1.07–2.28).
Conclusion
LCNS assessment, workload, and working practices are associated with the likelihood of patients receiving anticancer therapy. Enabling and supporting LCNSs to undertake key case management interventions offers an opportunity to improve treatment uptake and reduce the apparent gap in receipt of surgery for those suitable.
Citation
Stewart, I., Khakwani, A., Hubbard, R. B., Beckett, P., Borthwick, D., Tod, A., …Tata, L. J. (2018). Are working practices of lung cancer nurse specialists associated with variation in peoples’ receipt of anticancer therapy?. Lung Cancer, 123, 160-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.022
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 16, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 17, 2018 |
Publication Date | Sep 30, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Aug 9, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 10, 2018 |
Journal | Lung Cancer |
Print ISSN | 0169-5002 |
Electronic ISSN | 1872-8332 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 123 |
Pages | 160-165 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.022 |
Keywords | Lung cancer; Nurse specialists; Treatment; Workload; Case management; Clinical audit |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/987273 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500218304823?via%3Dihub |
Additional Information | This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Are working practices of lung cancer nurse specialists associated with variation in peoples’ receipt of anticancer therapy?; Journal Title: Lung Cancer; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.022; Content Type: article; Copyright: © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
Contract Date | Aug 9, 2018 |
Files
Stewart 2018 Lung Cancer
(212 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search