Professor KATHY CONKLIN K.CONKLIN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF PSYCHOLINGUISTICS
Assessing plain and intelligible language in the Consumer Rights Act: a role for reading scores?
Conklin, Kathy; Hyde, Richard; Parente, Fabio
Authors
Professor RICHARD HYDE RICHARD.HYDE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF LAW, REGULATION AND GOVERNANCE
Fabio Parente
Abstract
Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 consumer contracts and consumer notices are required to be expressed in plain and intelligible language. This is a difficult concept to capture. Determining whether a contract is expressed in plain and intelligible language involves resource intensive work by regulators and difficult adjudications by courts. This paper explores whether reading scores present a viable alternative. Can a simple computer program tell a consumer, a business, a regulator or the court that a particular contract is not expressed in plain and intelligible language? The paper begins by exploring the concept and role of plain and intelligible language in the Consumer Rights Act, before considering the ways that reading scores have developed and been used in legal contexts. We then report on the findings of an experimental examination of insurance contracts using a basket of reading scores, using our findings to draw conclusions about the utility of reading scores in determining whether a contract is expressed in plain and intelligible language. We find that reading scores can play a role in such determinations, but that further work is needed to provide appropriate tools for business, regulators and courts to use in assessing plain and intelligible language.
Citation
Conklin, K., Hyde, R., & Parente, F. (2019). Assessing plain and intelligible language in the Consumer Rights Act: a role for reading scores?. Legal Studies, 39(3), 378-397. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2018.25
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 27, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 10, 2019 |
Publication Date | Jan 10, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Apr 12, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 11, 2020 |
Journal | Legal Studies |
Print ISSN | 0261-3875 |
Electronic ISSN | 1748-121X |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 39 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 378-397 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2018.25 |
Keywords | Contracts; Insurance; Consumer Protection; Reading Scores; Regulation; Linguistic Analysis |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/921952 |
Publisher URL | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/legal-studies/article/assessing-plain-and-intelligible-language-in-the-consumer-rights-act-a-role-for-reading-scores/5A7EFDA81CD6AF84ADCAFF60CAD7CAB2 |
Contract Date | Apr 12, 2018 |
Files
Assessing Plain and Intelligible Language in the Consumer Rights Act - A Role for Reading Scores Accepted Version.pdf
(892 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
The Effect of Congruency and Frequency of Exposures on the Learning of L2 Binomials
(2023)
Journal Article
What triggers perceptions of racism in Heart of Darkness? A reader-response analysis
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search