Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Privatization and economic and social rights

Nolan, Aoife

Privatization and economic and social rights Thumbnail


Authors

AOIFE NOLAN Aoife.Nolan@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of International Human Rights Law



Abstract

Privatization is an ever more dominant model of economic and social rights (ESR) realization. Contracting out, public-private partnerships, and other approaches by which the private sector takes responsibility for, or supports the state in, delivering ESR-related goods and services are being advanced aggressively at both the national and supranational levels, with international financial institutions playing an especially influential role. Thus far, however, there has been relatively little attention paid to privatization in ESR scholarship and practice, resulting in a significant lacuna from both a normative and an empirical perspective. This gap is perhaps most striking—and worrying—in relation to the work of those international bodies mandated with interpreting and applying the ESR standards under international law. Taking as its starting point the delineation of ESR obligations in terms of the tripartite typology of respect, protect, and fulfill outlined by the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, this article considers how that framework (and the human rights treaty-monitoring bodies which employ it in their work) addresses privatization from an ESR perspective. Highlighting an excessive emphasis on the obligation to protect to the exclusion of other relevant levels of obligation, the author asserts that such an approach is reflective of a failure to conceptualize privatization and the state’s role with regard to such properly—a failure that has very serious implications for the ability of the ESR framework as it stands to capture rights-harming actions in the context of privatization effectively. Arguing for a shift to the obligation to fulfill, the author contends this alternative approach would contribute significantly to the ability of ESR law as it stands to capture—and address—the full scope of state decision-making and (in)action at issue in situations of privatization. The article concludes with observations on recent moves by the Committee which though in the right direction leave much work to be done.

Citation

Nolan, A. (2018). Privatization and economic and social rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 40(4), 815-858. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2018.0047

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 9, 2017
Publication Date Nov 1, 2018
Deposit Date Mar 2, 2018
Publicly Available Date Nov 1, 2018
Journal Human Rights Quarterly
Print ISSN 0275-0392
Electronic ISSN 1085-794X
Publisher Johns Hopkins University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 40
Issue 4
Pages 815-858
DOI https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2018.0047
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/886946
Publisher URL https://muse.jhu.edu/article/708639
Additional Information Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations