Thomas Roulet
Reconsidering the value of covert research: the role of ambiguous consent in participant observation
Roulet, Thomas; Gill, Michael; Stenger, Sebastien; Gill, David James
Authors
Michael Gill
Sebastien Stenger
Professor DAVID GILL DAVID.GILL@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Abstract
In this article, we provide a nuanced perspective on the benefits and costs of covert research. In particular, we illustrate the value of such an approach by focusing on covert participant observation. We posit that all observational studies sit along a continuum of consent, with few research projects being either fully overt or fully covert due to practical constraints and the ambiguous nature of consent itself. With reference to illustrative examples, we demonstrate that the study of deviant behaviors, secretive organizations and socially important topics is often only possible through substantially covert participant observation. To support further consideration of this method, we discuss different ethical perspectives and explore techniques to address the practical challenges of covert participant observation, including; gaining access, collecting data surreptitiously, reducing harm to participants, leaving the site of study and addressing ethical issues.
Citation
Roulet, T., Gill, M., Stenger, S., & Gill, D. J. (2017). Reconsidering the value of covert research: the role of ambiguous consent in participant observation. Organizational Research Methods, 20(3), 487-517. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117698745
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 16, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 23, 2017 |
Publication Date | Jul 31, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Mar 7, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 23, 2017 |
Journal | Organizational Research Methods |
Print ISSN | 1094-4281 |
Electronic ISSN | 1552-7425 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 20 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 487-517 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117698745 |
Keywords | Covert research, Covert participant observation, Field observation, Ethics in research, Qualitative research |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/875203 |
Publisher URL | http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1094428117698745 |
Related Public URLs | http://journals.sagepub.com/home/orm |
Additional Information | © 2017 by SAGE Publications |
Contract Date | Mar 7, 2017 |
Files
Roulet et al ORM 2017.pdf
(1.9 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
Coaxing corporations: Enriching the conceptualization of governments as strategic actors
(2023)
Journal Article
Rethinking sovereign default
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search