Christopher Iddon
A population framework for predicting the proportion of people infected by the far-field airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 indoors
Iddon, Christopher; Jones, Benjamin; Sharpe, Patrick; Cevik, Muge; Fitzgerald, Shaun
Authors
BENJAMIN JONES Benjamin.Jones@nottingham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Patrick Sharpe
Muge Cevik
Shaun Fitzgerald
Abstract
The number of occupants in a space influences the risk of far-field airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 because the likelihood of having infectious and susceptible people both correlate with the number of occupants. This paper explores the relationship between occupancy and the probability of infection, and how this affects an individual person and a population of people. Mass-balance and dose–response models determine far-field transmission risks for an individual person and a population of people after sub-dividing a large reference space into 10 identical comparator spaces. For a single infected person, the dose received by an individual person in the comparator space is 10 times higher because the equivalent ventilation rate per infected person is lower when the per capita ventilation rate is preserved. However, accounting for population dispersion, such as the community prevalence of the virus, the probability of an infected person being present and uncertainty in their viral load, shows the transmission probability increases with occupancy and the reference space has a higher transmission risk. Also, far-field transmission is likely to be a rare event that requires a high emission rate, and there are a set of Goldilocks conditions that are just right when equivalent ventilation is effective at mitigating against transmission. These conditions depend on the viral load, because when they are very high or low, equivalent ventilation has little effect on transmission risk. Nevertheless, resilient buildings should deliver the equivalent ventilation rate required by standards as minimum.
Citation
Iddon, C., Jones, B., Sharpe, P., Cevik, M., & Fitzgerald, S. (2022). A population framework for predicting the proportion of people infected by the far-field airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 indoors. Building and Environment, 221, Article 109309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109309
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 14, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 30, 2022 |
Publication Date | Aug 1, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Sep 9, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 1, 2023 |
Journal | Building and Environment |
Print ISSN | 0360-1323 |
Electronic ISSN | 1873-684X |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 221 |
Article Number | 109309 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109309 |
Keywords | Building and Construction; Geography, Planning and Development; Civil and Structural Engineering; Environmental Engineering |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/8636612 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132322005431?via%3Dihub |
Files
Supplemental
(8.8 Mb)
PDF
A population framework for predicting the proportion of people infected by the far-field airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 indoors
(834 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
A review of ventilation opening area terminology
(2016)
Journal Article
Quantifying uncertainty in thermophysical properties of walls by means of Bayesian inversion
(2018)
Journal Article
Home energy efficiency and radon related risk of lung cancer: Modelling study
(2014)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search