Marcella Favale
Is there a EU copyright jurisprudence?: an empirical analysis of the workings of the European Court of Justice
Favale, Marcella; Kretschmer, Martin; Torremans, Paul
Authors
Martin Kretschmer
Prof Dr PAUL TORREMANS PAUL.TORREMANS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Intellectual Property Law
Abstract
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been suspected of carrying out a harmonising agenda over and beyond the conventional law-interpreting function of the judiciary. In relation to the development of a EU copyright law, the Court has seen a dramatic increase in activity, with 6 cases filed in the 10 years following the Phil Collins case of 1992, 6 cases filed in the 5 years between 2002 and 2006, and 26 cases in the 5 years between 2007 and 2011. This study aims to investigate empirically two theories in relation to the development of EU copyright law: (i) that the Court has failed to develop a coherent copyright jurisprudence (lacking domain expertise, copyright specific reasoning, and predictability); (ii) that the Court has pursued an activist, harmonising agenda (resorting to teleological interpretation of European law rather than – less discretionary – semantic and systematic legal approaches). The findings of the study confirm the former, and qualify the latter.
Citation
Favale, M., Kretschmer, M., & Torremans, P. (2016). Is there a EU copyright jurisprudence?: an empirical analysis of the workings of the European Court of Justice. Modern Law Review, 79(1), 31-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12166
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 15, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jan 14, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 15, 2016 |
Journal | Modern Law Review |
Print ISSN | 0026-7961 |
Electronic ISSN | 1468-2230 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 79 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 31-75 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12166 |
Keywords | Court of Justice of the European Union, CJEU, Copyright, European jurisprudence, Advocate General, Harmonization, European Union |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/772573 |
Publisher URL | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2230.12166/abstract |
Additional Information | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Favale, M., Kretschmer, M. and Torremans, P. C. (2016), Is there an EU Copyright Jurisprudence? An Empirical Analysis of the Workings of the European Court of Justice. The Modern Law Review, 79: 31–75. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12166, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2230.12166/abstract. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. |
Files
MLR author's version ECJ Copyright Jurisprudence-final.pdf
(651 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Intellectual Property puts Art.6(1) Brussels I Regulation to the Test
(2014)
Journal Article
Intellectual Property Puts Article 6(1) Brussels I Regulation to the Test
(2013)
Preprint / Working Paper
Jurisdiction for cross-border intellectual property infringement cases in Europe
(2016)
Journal Article
The law applicable to copyright infringement on the Internet
(2016)
Journal Article
De context van de zaak Hejduk
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search