Marcella Favale
Is there a EU copyright jurisprudence?: an empirical analysis of the workings of the European Court of Justice
Favale, Marcella; Kretschmer, Martin; Torremans, Paul
Authors
Martin Kretschmer
PAUL TORREMANS PAUL.TORREMANS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Intellectual Property Law
Abstract
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been suspected of carrying out a harmonising agenda over and beyond the conventional law-interpreting function of the judiciary. In relation to the development of a EU copyright law, the Court has seen a dramatic increase in activity, with 6 cases filed in the 10 years following the Phil Collins case of 1992, 6 cases filed in the 5 years between 2002 and 2006, and 26 cases in the 5 years between 2007 and 2011. This study aims to investigate empirically two theories in relation to the development of EU copyright law: (i) that the Court has failed to develop a coherent copyright jurisprudence (lacking domain expertise, copyright specific reasoning, and predictability); (ii) that the Court has pursued an activist, harmonising agenda (resorting to teleological interpretation of European law rather than – less discretionary – semantic and systematic legal approaches). The findings of the study confirm the former, and qualify the latter.
Citation
Favale, M., Kretschmer, M., & Torremans, P. (2016). Is there a EU copyright jurisprudence?: an empirical analysis of the workings of the European Court of Justice. Modern Law Review, 79(1), 31-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12166
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 15, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jan 14, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 15, 2016 |
Journal | Modern Law Review |
Print ISSN | 0026-7961 |
Electronic ISSN | 1468-2230 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 79 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 31-75 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12166 |
Keywords | Court of Justice of the European Union, CJEU, Copyright, European jurisprudence, Advocate General, Harmonization, European Union |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/772573 |
Publisher URL | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2230.12166/abstract |
Additional Information | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Favale, M., Kretschmer, M. and Torremans, P. C. (2016), Is there an EU Copyright Jurisprudence? An Empirical Analysis of the Workings of the European Court of Justice. The Modern Law Review, 79: 31–75. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12166, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2230.12166/abstract. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. |
Files
MLR author's version ECJ Copyright Jurisprudence-final.pdf
(651 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
The protection of cultural heritage by copyright and related rights
(2022)
Book Chapter
Intellectual Property
(2022)
Book Chapter
EU Copyright Law: A Commentary
(2021)
Book